- Rank
- #337
- Total Output Tokens
- 118,380
- Response Time (avg)
- 38.01s
- Total Cost
- $0.000
Cobuddy (medium) vs Ling 3.0 Tiny (high)
Cobuddy (medium) leads on average score with 4.4 vs 3.7. Benchmark cost is effectively tied at $0.000 vs $0.000. Cobuddy (medium) is faster at 38.01s vs 72.24s, with pass rates of 43.5% vs 23.2%.
Compared models
- Rank
- #354
- Total Output Tokens
- 950,683
- Response Time (avg)
- 72.24s
- Total Cost
- $0.000
Recommended model
Cobuddy (medium)
It has the best score here (4.4), while responding about 1.9x faster than Ling 3.0 Tiny (high).
Detailed comparison
| Metric | Cobuddy Cobuddy medium Free Available | Ling 3.0 Tiny Ling 3.0 Tiny high |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 4.4 | 3.7 |
| Rank | #337 | #354 |
| Reliability | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| Consistency | 7.3 | 8.9 |
| Attempts | 66/69 | 69/69 |
| Tests Correct | ||
| Attempt pass rate | 43.5% | 23.2% |
| Flaky tests | 6 | 3 |
| Total Runs | 66 | 69 |
| Cost per result | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Total Cost | $0.000 | $0.000 |
| Input Price | $0.000 / 1M | $0.000 / 1M |
| Output Price | $0.000 / 1M | $0.000 / 1M |
| Total Input Tokens | 37,449 | 115,314 |
| Output Tokens | 1,677 | 133,965 |
| Reasoning Tokens | 116,703 | 816,718 |
| Response Time (avg) | 38.01s | 72.24s |
| Response Time (max) | 309.02s | 345.15s |
| Response Time (total) | 798.15s | 1589.23s |
| Parameters | ~21B total (~3B active) | 7.9B total (1.3B active) |
| Availability | Closed | Open source |
Model generation showcase
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#337 Cobuddy
medium
No endpoints found for baidu/cobuddy:free.
- Cost
- $0.000
- Time
- 0.1s
- Tokens
- 0 tok
#354 Ling 3.0 Tiny
high
No output was saved. The original provider response or failure reason is unavailable.
- Cost
- $0.000
- Time
- 169.5s
- Tokens
- 5,252 tok
Top Models by Score
Score vs Total Cost
Response Time (avg)
Score vs Response Time (avg)
Total Output Tokens
Score vs Total Output Tokens
Category Breakdown
| Agentic | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cobuddy | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 173ms | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Ling 3.0 Tiny | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 28ms | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Anti-AI Tricks | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cobuddy | 8.7 | 7.9 | 91.7% | 1 | 10.00s | 453 | 98 | 4,666 | |
| Ling 3.0 Tiny | 6.4 | 7.9 | 58.3% | 1 | 24.93s | 750 | 5,102 | 94,893 |
| Coding | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cobuddy | 3.7 | 6.7 | 22.2% | 1 | 79.17s | 4,726 | 358 | 30,138 | |
| Ling 3.0 Tiny | 2.9 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 177.65s | 7,767 | 59,320 | 177,922 |
| Combined | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cobuddy | 1.5 | 5.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 47.38s | 18,324 | 465 | 7,265 | |
| Ling 3.0 Tiny | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 179.85s | 87,658 | 19,652 | 152,168 |
| Data parsing and extraction | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cobuddy | 6.3 | 5.8 | 66.7% | 1 | 17.36s | 8,181 | 275 | 5,591 | |
| Ling 3.0 Tiny | 2.8 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 4.16s | 8,016 | 1,561 | 5,372 |
| Domain specific | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cobuddy | 2.9 | 4.4 | 22.2% | 2 | 128.15s | 540 | 10 | 49,454 | |
| Ling 3.0 Tiny | 2.9 | 7.2 | 11.1% | 1 | 70.12s | 648 | 22,445 | 155,528 |
| General Intelligence | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cobuddy | 4.2 | 9.9 | 0.0% | 0 | 23.23s | 498 | 76 | 3,782 | |
| Ling 3.0 Tiny | 5.4 | 2.5 | 66.7% | 1 | 60.50s | 546 | 4,900 | 61,589 |
| Instructions following | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cobuddy | 9.8 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 11.60s | 508 | 64 | 2,842 | |
| Ling 3.0 Tiny | 6.8 | 9.4 | 50.0% | 0 | 3.10s | 744 | 618 | 1,444 |
| Puzzle Solving | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cobuddy | 3.6 | 7.2 | 22.2% | 1 | 12.83s | 561 | 189 | 5,808 | |
| Ling 3.0 Tiny | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 54.15s | 731 | 10,323 | 78,452 |
| Tool Calling | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cobuddy | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 11.19s | 3,505 | 133 | 294 | |
| Ling 3.0 Tiny | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 5.76s | 8,226 | 379 | 711 |
| Trivia | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cobuddy | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 36.98s | 153 | 9 | 6,863 | |
| Ling 3.0 Tiny | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 213.35s | 228 | 9,665 | 88,639 |
Quick Compare
Switch Comparison Pair
CobuddymediumFree AvailablevsMercury 2noneCobuddymediumFree AvailablevsGranite 4.2 8BnoneTrinity Large PreviewnoneFree AvailablevsCobuddymediumFree AvailableCobuddymediumFree AvailablevsKAT Coder AIR V2.5noneCobuddymediumFree AvailablevsNemotron 3 SupernoneFree AvailableLing 3.0 TinyhighvsNemotron 3.5 LightningnoneFree AvailableGranite 4.1 8bnonevsLing 3.0 TinyhighCobuddymediumFree AvailablevsRing 2.6 1tnoneCobuddymediumFree AvailablevsLing 2.6 FlashnoneCobuddymediumFree Availablevsgpt-oss-120bnoneCobuddymediumFree AvailablevsNemotron 3.5 LightninglowFree AvailableCobuddymediumFree AvailablevsLaguna S 2.1lowFree Available