Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

AI BENCHY Compare

Cobuddy vs IBM: Granite 4.1 8B

Summary

Cobuddy vs Granite 4.1 8B benchmark comparison: Cobuddy leads on average score with 4.9 vs 4.0. Cobuddy has the lower benchmark cost at $0.000 vs $0.003. Granite 4.1 8B is faster at 728ms vs 39.90s, with pass rates of 47.6% vs 9.5%.

Recommended model: Granite 4.1 8B - It offers the best overall trade-off: a competitive score (4.0), faster response than Cobuddy, and balanced cost.

Last updated at: 2026-06-12

Metric Cobuddy Cobuddy medium Release: 2026-05-06 Granite 4.1 8B Granite 4.1 8B none Release: 2026-05-01
Score 4.9 4.0
Rank #144 #163
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 7.5 10.0
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 47.6% 9.5%
Flaky tests 6 0
Total Runs 63 63
Cost per result 0.000 0.131
Total Cost $0.000 $0.003
Input Price $0.000 / 1M $0.050 / 1M
Output Price $0.000 / 1M $0.100 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 37,449 46,285
Output Tokens 1,677 2,911
Reasoning Tokens 116,703 0
Response Time (avg) 39.90s 728ms
Response Time (max) 309.02s 2.17s
Response Time (total) 797.98s 15.29s

Generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#144 Cobuddy

medium
No showcase result has been generated for this model yet.
Cost
$0.000
Time
-
Tokens
0 tok

#163 IBM: Granite 4.1 8B

none
Cost
$0.001
Time
3.2s
Tokens
491 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Anti-AI Tricks Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Cobuddy 8.7 7.9 91.7% 1 10.00s 453 98 4,666
Granite 4.1 8B 4.9 10.0 25.0% 0 844ms 645 903 0
Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Cobuddy 3.7 6.7 22.2% 1 79.17s 4,726 358 30,138
Granite 4.1 8B 4.5 10.0 0.0% 0 775ms 8,344 525 0
Combined Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Cobuddy 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 47.38s 18,324 465 7,265
Granite 4.1 8B 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 1.88s 19,089 396 0
Data parsing and extraction Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Cobuddy 6.3 5.8 66.7% 1 17.36s 8,181 275 5,591
Granite 4.1 8B 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 575ms 7,617 195 0
Domain specific Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Cobuddy 2.9 4.4 22.2% 2 128.15s 540 10 49,454
Granite 4.1 8B 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 357ms 768 24 0
General Intelligence Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Cobuddy 4.2 9.9 0.0% 0 23.23s 498 76 3,782
Granite 4.1 8B 4.0 10.0 0.0% 0 499ms 528 115 0
Instructions following Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Cobuddy 9.8 10.0 100.0% 0 11.60s 508 64 2,842
Granite 4.1 8B 3.6 9.9 0.0% 0 344ms 687 66 0
Puzzle Solving Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Cobuddy 3.6 7.2 22.2% 1 12.83s 561 189 5,808
Granite 4.1 8B 3.2 10.0 0.0% 0 608ms 672 432 0
Tool Calling Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Cobuddy 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 11.19s 3,505 133 294
Granite 4.1 8B 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 2.17s 7,719 243 0
Trivia Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Cobuddy 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 36.98s 153 9 6,863
Granite 4.1 8B 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 306ms 216 12 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair