Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs Qwen: Qwen3.7 Max

Qwen3.7 Max leads on average score with 7.4 vs 7.3. Qwen3.7 Max has the lower benchmark cost at $0.197 vs $0.661. Qwen3.7 Max is faster at 4.52s vs 8.12s, with pass rates of 57.6% vs 68.2%.

Recommended modelQwen3.7 MaxIt has the best score here (7.4), while costing about 3.4x less than Claude Sonnet 4.6.
Rank
#71
Attempt pass rate
57.6%
Total Output Tokens
19,362
Response Time (avg)
8.12s
Total Cost
$0.661
Rank
#67
Attempt pass rate
68.2%
Total Output Tokens
12,446
Response Time (avg)
4.52s
Total Cost
$0.197

Last updated at: 2026-07-25

Metric Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 none Release: 2026-02-17 Qwen3.7 Max Qwen3.7 Max none Release: 2026-05-22
Score 7.3 7.4
Rank #71 #67
Reliability 10.0 9.9
Consistency 9.7 10.0
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 57.6% 68.2%
Flaky tests 1 0
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 5.502 1.582
Total Cost $0.661 $0.197
Input Price $3.000 / 1M $1.475 / 1M
Output Price $15.000 / 1M $4.425 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 123,264 95,983
Output Tokens 19,362 12,446
Reasoning Tokens 0 0
Response Time (avg) 8.12s 4.52s
Response Time (max) 51.18s 72.30s
Response Time (total) 121.78s 99.52s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#71 Claude Sonnet 4.6

none
Cost
$0.038
Time
27.3s
Tokens
2,598 tok

#67 Qwen3.7 Max

none
Cost
$0.046
Time
195.0s
Tokens
12,171 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Claude Sonnet 4.6 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 5.19s 8,522 2,127 0
Qwen3.7 Max 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 1.35s 7,911 582 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair