Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

AI BENCHY Compare

Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 vs Z.ai: GLM 5

Summary

Claude Opus 4.7 (medium) leads on average score with 8.7 vs 8.6. GLM 5 (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.228 vs $0.679. Claude Opus 4.7 (medium) is faster at 4.73s vs 33.54s, with pass rates of 82.5% vs 82.5%.

Recommended modelClaude Opus 4.7 (medium)It has the best score here (8.7), while responding about 7.1x faster than GLM 5 (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-14

Metric Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 medium Release: 2026-04-16 GLM 5 GLM 5 medium Release: 2026-02-12
Score 8.7 8.6
Rank #16 #18
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.6 8.5
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 82.5% 82.5%
Flaky tests 1 4
Total Runs 63 63
Cost per result 3.991 1.668
Total Cost $0.679 $0.228
Input Price $5.000 / 1M $0.600 / 1M
Output Price $25.000 / 1M $1.920 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 65,406 35,224
Output Tokens 11,858 21,570
Reasoning Tokens 2,198 102,996
Response Time (avg) 4.73s 33.54s
Response Time (max) 23.18s 99.85s
Response Time (total) 94.51s 435.99s

Generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#16 Claude Opus 4.7

medium
Cost
$0.059
Time
26.8s
Tokens
2,475 tok

#18 GLM 5

medium
Cost
$0.005
Time
20.7s
Tokens
2,068 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Claude Opus 4.7 7.6 7.2 77.8% 1 12.96s 10,635 7,629 1,114
GLM 5 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 74.30s 7,254 2,997 52,930

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair