Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

AI BENCHY Compare

Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.2

Summary

Claude Opus 4.7 (medium) leads on average score with 8.7 vs 8.0. GLM 5.2 (high) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.667 vs $0.679. Claude Opus 4.7 (medium) is faster at 4.73s vs 37.09s, with pass rates of 82.5% vs 77.8%.

Recommended modelClaude Opus 4.7 (medium)It has the best score here (8.7), while responding about 7.8x faster than GLM 5.2 (high).

Last updated at: 2026-07-14

Metric Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 medium Release: 2026-04-16 GLM 5.2 GLM 5.2 high Release: 2026-06-17
Score 8.7 8.0
Rank #16 #32
Reliability 10.0 9.3
Consistency 9.6 7.6
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 82.5% 77.8%
Flaky tests 1 6
Total Runs 63 63
Cost per result 3.991 4.255
Total Cost $0.679 $0.667
Input Price $5.000 / 1M $0.929 / 1M
Output Price $25.000 / 1M $2.918 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 65,406 34,993
Output Tokens 11,858 51,575
Reasoning Tokens 2,198 166,065
Response Time (avg) 4.73s 37.09s
Response Time (max) 23.18s 180.69s
Response Time (total) 94.51s 778.91s

Generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#16 Claude Opus 4.7

medium
Cost
$0.059
Time
26.8s
Tokens
2,475 tok

#32 GLM 5.2

high
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.000
Time
300.0s
Tokens
0 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Claude Opus 4.7 7.6 7.2 77.8% 1 12.96s 10,635 7,629 1,114
GLM 5.2 6.4 4.4 77.8% 2 73.03s 5,124 2,302 22,546

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair