Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

AI BENCHY Compare

Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.6 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.2

Summary

Claude Opus 4.6 vs GLM 5.2 benchmark comparison: Claude Opus 4.6 leads on average score with 7.7 vs 7.1. GLM 5.2 has the lower benchmark cost at $0.076 vs $2.053. GLM 5.2 is faster at 6.34s vs 25.89s, with pass rates of 61.9% vs 60.3%.

Recommended model: GLM 5.2 - Its score stays close to the best score here (7.1 vs 7.7), while costing about 27.2x less than Claude Opus 4.6.

Last updated at: 2026-06-18

Metric Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 medium Release: 2026-02-05 GLM 5.2 GLM 5.2 none Release: 2026-06-17
Score 7.7 7.1
Rank #38 #61
Reliability 10.0 9.9
Consistency 8.8 9.6
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 61.9% 60.3%
Flaky tests 3 1
Total Runs 63 63
Cost per result 17.103 0.628
Total Cost $2.053 $0.076
Input Price $5.000 / 1M $1.400 / 1M
Output Price $25.000 / 1M $4.400 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 53,227 38,671
Output Tokens 47,446 4,817
Reasoning Tokens 24,000 0
Response Time (avg) 25.89s 6.34s
Response Time (max) 83.40s 20.69s
Response Time (total) 362.49s 133.19s

Generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#38 Claude Opus 4.6

medium
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.000
Time
300.0s
Tokens
0 tok

#61 GLM 5.2

none
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.033
Time
87.7s
Tokens
7,455 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Anti-AI Tricks Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Claude Opus 4.6 6.4 5.8 66.7% 2 7.45s 840 986 1,071
GLM 5.2 8.3 10.0 75.0% 0 3.70s 567 313 0
Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Claude Opus 4.6 5.7 7.1 44.4% 1 30.10s 8,522 13,057 4,121
GLM 5.2 3.7 9.5 0.0% 0 7.55s 7,263 1,958 0
Combined Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Claude Opus 4.6 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 76.66s 20,685 8,178 5,194
GLM 5.2 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 20.69s 14,296 1,489 0
Data parsing and extraction Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Claude Opus 4.6 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 7.37s 8,676 691 757
GLM 5.2 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 7.17s 7,113 204 0
Domain specific Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Claude Opus 4.6 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 83.40s 674 14,642 8,687
GLM 5.2 5.3 10.0 33.3% 0 6.50s 696 27 0
General Intelligence Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Claude Opus 4.6 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 5.04s 564 188 292
GLM 5.2 6.1 3.1 66.7% 1 4.42s 480 82 0
Instructions following Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Claude Opus 4.6 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 2.43s 792 266 467
GLM 5.2 9.8 10.0 100.0% 0 3.84s 642 66 0
Puzzle Solving Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Claude Opus 4.6 7.7 10.0 66.7% 0 4.71s 816 532 630
GLM 5.2 7.7 10.0 66.7% 0 3.31s 618 265 0
Tool Calling Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Claude Opus 4.6 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 9.73s 11,454 861 329
GLM 5.2 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 15.76s 6,807 400 0
Trivia Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Claude Opus 4.6 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 63.24s 204 8,045 2,452
GLM 5.2 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 3.41s 189 13 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair

Claude Opus 4.6mediumvsStep 3.7 FlashlowGemma 4 26B A4BmediumFree AvailablevsGLM 5.2noneStep 3.7 FlashhighvsGLM 5.2noneClaude Opus 4.6mediumvsDeepSeek V4 ProhighKimi K2.7 CodemediumvsGLM 5.2noneClaude Opus 4.6mediumvsGPT-5.3 ChatnoneGrok 4.20mediumvsGLM 5.2noneGemini 3 Flash PreviewlowvsGLM 5.2noneMiMo-V2.5-PromediumvsGLM 5.2noneSeed-2.0-MinimediumvsGLM 5.2noneQwen3.5-FlashmediumvsGLM 5.2noneGemini 3.5 FlashminimalvsGLM 5.2none