Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

AI BENCHY Compare

Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.6 vs OpenAI: GPT-5.3 Chat

Summary

Claude Opus 4.6 (medium) leads on average score with 7.7 vs 7.5. GPT-5.3 Chat has the lower benchmark cost at $0.433 vs $2.053. GPT-5.3 Chat is faster at 6.34s vs 25.89s, with pass rates of 61.9% vs 66.7%.

Recommended modelGPT-5.3 ChatIts score stays close to the best score here (7.5 vs 7.7), while costing about 4.7x less than Claude Opus 4.6 (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-14

Metric Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 medium Release: 2026-02-05 GPT-5.3 Chat GPT-5.3 Chat none Release: 2026-03-03
Score 7.7 7.5
Rank #50 #61
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.8 8.1
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 61.9% 66.7%
Flaky tests 3 5
Total Runs 63 63
Cost per result 17.103 3.605
Total Cost $2.053 $0.433
Input Price $5.000 / 1M $1.750 / 1M
Output Price $25.000 / 1M $14.000 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 53,227 34,209
Output Tokens 47,446 26,617
Reasoning Tokens 24,000 0
Response Time (avg) 25.89s 6.34s
Response Time (max) 83.40s 18.33s
Response Time (total) 362.49s 133.13s

Generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#50 Claude Opus 4.6

medium
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.000
Time
300.0s
Tokens
0 tok

#61 GPT-5.3 Chat

none
Cost
$0.008
Time
8.1s
Tokens
634 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Claude Opus 4.6 5.7 7.1 44.4% 1 30.10s 8,522 13,057 4,121
GPT-5.3 Chat 5.6 4.7 55.6% 2 10.52s 7,302 6,632 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair