Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.6 vs OpenAI: GPT-5.3 Chat

Claude Opus 4.6 (medium) leads on average score with 7.7 vs 7.5. GPT-5.3 Chat has the lower benchmark cost at $0.571 vs $3.059. GPT-5.3 Chat is faster at 6.88s vs 34.27s, with pass rates of 63.6% vs 68.2%.

Recommended modelGPT-5.3 ChatIts score stays close to the best score here (7.5 vs 7.7), while costing about 5.4x less than Claude Opus 4.6 (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-25

Metric Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 medium Release: 2026-02-05 GPT-5.3 Chat GPT-5.3 Chat none Release: 2026-03-03
Score 7.7 7.5
Rank #50 #62
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.8 8.2
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 63.6% 68.2%
Flaky tests 3 5
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 23.524 4.387
Total Cost $3.059 $0.571
Input Price $5.000 / 1M $1.750 / 1M
Output Price $25.000 / 1M $14.000 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 108,615 78,990
Output Tokens 72,286 30,854
Reasoning Tokens 28,315 0
Response Time (avg) 34.27s 6.88s
Response Time (max) 151.51s 18.33s
Response Time (total) 513.99s 151.31s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#50 Claude Opus 4.6

medium
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.000
Time
300.0s
Tokens
0 tok

#62 GPT-5.3 Chat

none
Cost
$0.008
Time
8.1s
Tokens
634 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Claude Opus 4.6 5.7 7.1 44.4% 1 30.10s 8,522 13,057 4,121
GPT-5.3 Chat 5.6 4.7 55.6% 2 10.52s 7,302 6,632 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair