Data parsing and extraction Ranking
See which AI models perform best on Data parsing and extraction, which ones stay reliable, and where the biggest gaps appear.
359/359
Filter models
No models match the current search and filters.
| Rank | Model | Company | Data parsing and extraction Score | Score | Total Cost | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #74 | Claude Fable 5.1 medium | Anthropic | 10.0 | 8.3 | $2.909 | 2/2 | 4.47s |
| #75 | Gemini 2.5 Flash medium | 10.0 | 8.2 | $0.644 | 2/2 | 4.06s | |
| #76 | Muse Spark 1.3 low | Meta | 10.0 | 8.2 | $0.689 | 2/2 | 3.62s |
| #77 | Claude Sonnet 5 medium | Anthropic | 10.0 | 8.2 | $0.922 | 2/2 | 3.16s |
| #78 | Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B low | Qwen | 10.0 | 8.1 | $2.672 | 2/2 | 22.3s |
| #79 | GPT-5 Mini medium | OpenAI | 10.0 | 8.1 | $0.241 | 2/2 | 12.6s |
| #80 | Muse Glimmer 30B xhigh | Meta | 10.0 | 8.1 | $0.510 | 2/2 | 19.8s |
| #81 | Grok 4.7 medium | X AI | 10.0 | 8.1 | $2.254 | 2/2 | 5.16s |
| #82 | Inkling high | Thinkingmachines | 10.0 | 8.0 | $1.046 | 2/2 | 8.19s |
| #83 | Muse Spark 1.1 high | Meta | 10.0 | 8.0 | $2.253 | 2/2 | 8.40s |
| #84 | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 low | DeepSeek | 10.0 | 8.0 | $0.138 | 2/2 | 4.35s |
| #85 | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 high | DeepSeek | 10.0 | 8.0 | $0.279 | 2/2 | 3.65s |
| #86 | GLM 5.2 high | Z.ai | 10.0 | 8.0 | $0.799 | 2/2 | 5.81s |
| #87 | Inkling medium | Thinkingmachines | 10.0 | 8.0 | $0.383 | 2/2 | 3.60s |
| #88 | GPT-5.6 Terra high | OpenAI | 10.0 | 8.0 | $0.836 | 2/2 | 938ms |