Data parsing and extraction Ranking
See which AI models perform best on Data parsing and extraction, which ones stay reliable, and where the biggest gaps appear.
359/359
Filter models
No models match the current search and filters.
| Rank | Model | Company | Data parsing and extraction Score | Score | Total Cost | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #89 | Grok 4.7 low | X AI | 10.0 | 7.9 | $1.320 | 2/2 | 4.88s |
| #91 | GPT-5.2 Chat none | OpenAI | 10.0 | 7.9 | $0.594 | 2/2 | 3.05s |
| #92 | Step 3.7 Flash medium | Stepfun | 10.0 | 7.9 | $0.495 | 2/2 | 2.75s |
| #93 | Qwen3.8 27B low | Qwen | 10.0 | 7.9 | ~$0.071 | 2/2 | 8.03s |
| #94 | GPT-6 Luna medium | OpenAI | 10.0 | 7.9 | $0.031 | 2/2 | 26.1s |
| #95 | Qwen3.7 Plus medium | Qwen | 10.0 | 7.9 | $0.277 | 2/2 | 21.7s |
| #96 | Qwen3.6 Plus medium | Qwen | 10.0 | 7.8 | $0.418 | 2/2 | 14.9s |
| #97 | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite medium | 10.0 | 7.8 | $0.272 | 2/2 | 2.11s | |
| #98 | GLM 5.2 medium | Z.ai | 10.0 | 7.8 | $0.151 | 2/2 | 13.4s |
| #99 | GPT-5.6 Terra medium | OpenAI | 10.0 | 7.8 | $0.523 | 2/2 | 872ms |
| #100 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 medium | Anthropic | 10.0 | 7.8 | $2.126 | 2/2 | 13.9s |
| #102 | Seed-2.0-Lite medium | Bytedance Seed | 10.0 | 7.8 | $0.236 | 2/2 | 9.07s |
| #104 | Qwen3.7 Flash high | Qwen | 10.0 | 7.8 | $0.052 | 2/2 | 20.1s |
| #107 | Claude Opus 4.6 medium | Anthropic | 10.0 | 7.7 | $2.961 | 2/2 | 7.37s |
| #108 | DeepSeek V4 Pro high | DeepSeek | 10.0 | 7.7 | $0.454 | 2/2 | 25.0s |