Data parsing and extraction Ranking
See which AI models perform best on Data parsing and extraction, which ones stay reliable, and where the biggest gaps appear.
359/359
Filter models
No models match the current search and filters.
| Rank | Model | Company | Data parsing and extraction Score | Score | Total Cost | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #55 | Qwen3.8 Max low | Qwen | 10.0 | 8.6 | $0.702 | 2/2 | 7.87s |
| #56 | GPT-5.4 medium | OpenAI | 10.0 | 8.5 | $1.560 | 2/2 | 5.32s |
| #60 | Grok 4.5 medium | X AI | 10.0 | 8.5 | $2.042 | 2/2 | 6.29s |
| #61 | Muse Spark 1.2 low | Meta | 10.0 | 8.4 | $0.655 | 2/2 | 4.22s |
| #62 | Grok 4.6 medium | X AI | 10.0 | 8.4 | $1.713 | 2/2 | 11.5s |
| #63 | Grok 4.5 low | X AI | 10.0 | 8.4 | $0.945 | 2/2 | 3.44s |
| #64 | GPT-5.2 medium | OpenAI | 10.0 | 8.4 | $1.182 | 2/2 | 3.15s |
| #65 | Qwen3.8 27B high | Qwen | 10.0 | 8.4 | ~$0.287 | 2/2 | 34.9s |
| #66 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro medium | Xiaomi | 10.0 | 8.4 | $0.477 | 2/2 | 2.71s |
| #67 | Seed 2.1 Turbo medium | Bytedance Seed | 10.0 | 8.4 | $1.951 | 2/2 | 37.8s |
| #68 | GPT-6 Sol low | OpenAI | 10.0 | 8.4 | $0.273 | 2/2 | 13.6s |
| #69 | Inkling Small high | Thinkingmachines | 10.0 | 8.4 | $0.398 | 2/2 | 3.99s |
| #70 | GLM 5.3 FlashX max | Z.ai | 10.0 | 8.3 | $0.508 | 2/2 | 3.38s |
| #72 | Muse Spark 1.1 low | Meta | 10.0 | 8.3 | $0.673 | 2/2 | 3.22s |
| #73 | GPT-6 Luna high | OpenAI | 10.0 | 8.3 | $0.054 | 2/2 | 24.5s |