AI BENCHY Category
Data parsing and extraction Ranking
See which AI models perform best on Data parsing and extraction, which ones stay reliable, and where the biggest gaps appear.
| Rank | Model | Company | Data parsing and extraction Score | Score | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #72 | DeepSeek V3.2 medium | DeepSeek | 10.0 | 7.0 | 2/2 | 36.1s |
| #73 | Seed-2.0-Mini medium | Bytedance Seed | 10.0 | 6.9 | 2/2 | 24.3s |
| #74 | Qwen3.6 Max Preview none | Qwen | 10.0 | 6.9 | 2/2 | 2.87s |
| #76 | Kimi K2.5 medium | Moonshot AI | 10.0 | 6.8 | 2/2 | 49.8s |
| #77 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 none | Anthropic | 10.0 | 6.8 | 2/2 | 3.43s |
| #79 | Hunter Alpha medium | OpenRouter | 10.0 | 6.7 | 2/2 | 23.2s |
| #80 | Mimo V2 Omni medium | Xiaomi | 10.0 | 6.7 | 2/2 | 3.04s |
| #84 | Grok 4.20 Multi Agent Beta medium | X AI | 10.0 | 6.6 | 2/2 | 5.54s |
| #85 | Gemma 4 31B none | 10.0 | 6.5 | 2/2 | 2.25s | |
| #86 | Grok 4.1 Fast medium | X AI | 10.0 | 6.5 | 2/2 | 6.63s |
| #87 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite minimal | 10.0 | 6.4 | 2/2 | 1.04s | |
| #88 | Qwen3.7 Plus none | Qwen | 10.0 | 6.4 | 2/2 | 1.43s |
| #90 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite none | 10.0 | 6.4 | 2/2 | 843ms | |
| #91 | GPT-5.5 none | OpenAI | 10.0 | 6.4 | 2/2 | 1.18s |
| #92 | Laguna M.1 medium | Poolside | 10.0 | 6.4 | 2/2 | 4.93s |