Data parsing and extraction Ranking
See which AI models perform best on Data parsing and extraction, which ones stay reliable, and where the biggest gaps appear.
359/359
Filter models
No models match the current search and filters.
| Rank | Model | Company | Data parsing and extraction Score | Score | Total Cost | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #39 | Pareto none | Unbiased | 10.0 | 8.9 | $1.172 | 2/2 | 2.57s |
| #40 | Seed 2.1 Turbo high | Bytedance Seed | 10.0 | 8.9 | $1.797 | 2/2 | 33.7s |
| #41 | Gemini 3.5 Flash low | 10.0 | 8.8 | $0.449 | 2/2 | 1.81s | |
| #42 | Qwen3.8 Max (0902) medium | Qwen | 10.0 | 8.8 | $0.677 | 2/2 | 10.5s |
| #43 | Muse Spark 1.3 medium | Meta | 10.0 | 8.8 | $1.469 | 2/2 | 8.75s |
| #44 | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite high | 10.0 | 8.8 | $0.540 | 2/2 | 3.17s | |
| #46 | Claude Opus 5 low | Anthropic | 10.0 | 8.7 | $1.121 | 2/2 | 3.69s |
| #47 | Gemini 3.6 Flash low | 10.0 | 8.7 | $0.251 | 2/2 | 1.66s | |
| #48 | GLM 5.3 Flash max | Z.ai | 10.0 | 8.7 | $0.117 | 2/2 | 6.10s |
| #49 | Claude Opus 4.7 medium | Anthropic | 10.0 | 8.7 | $1.476 | 2/2 | 2.37s |
| #50 | Muse Spark 1.2 high | Meta | 10.0 | 8.7 | $1.771 | 2/2 | 6.93s |
| #51 | Muse Spark 1.2 medium | Meta | 10.0 | 8.6 | $1.339 | 2/2 | 6.42s |
| #52 | Muse Spark 1.1 medium | Meta | 10.0 | 8.6 | $1.420 | 2/2 | 4.96s |
| #53 | Claude Fable 5 medium | Anthropic | 10.0 | 8.6 | $3.004 | 2/2 | 7.18s |
| #54 | Qwen3.6 Max Preview medium | Qwen | 10.0 | 8.6 | $1.132 | 2/2 | 41.2s |