AI BENCHY Category
Data parsing and extraction Ranking
See which AI models perform best on Data parsing and extraction, which ones stay reliable, and where the biggest gaps appear.
| Rank | Model | Company | Data parsing and extraction Score | Score | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #34 | Kimi K2.6 medium | Moonshot AI | 10.0 | 7.7 | 2/2 | 20.4s |
| #35 | MiMo-V2-Omni medium | Xiaomi | 10.0 | 7.7 | 2/2 | 2.29s |
| #36 | GPT-5.3 Chat none | OpenAI | 10.0 | 7.7 | 2/2 | 2.21s |
| #37 | Claude Opus 4.6 medium | Anthropic | 10.0 | 7.6 | 2/2 | 7.37s |
| #38 | GPT-5.4 Nano medium | OpenAI | 10.0 | 7.6 | 2/2 | 2.54s |
| #39 | Seed-2.0-Mini medium | Bytedance Seed | 10.0 | 7.5 | 2/2 | 24.3s |
| #40 | GPT-5.2 medium | OpenAI | 10.0 | 7.5 | 2/2 | 3.15s |
| #42 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 none | Anthropic | 10.0 | 7.4 | 2/2 | 3.43s |
| #44 | GPT-5.4 Mini medium | OpenAI | 10.0 | 7.3 | 2/2 | 2.43s |
| #45 | GPT-5 Mini medium | OpenAI | 10.0 | 7.0 | 2/2 | 12.6s |
| #46 | Kimi K2.5 medium | Moonshot AI | 10.0 | 7.0 | 2/2 | 49.8s |
| #47 | Grok 4.20 medium | X AI | 10.0 | 7.0 | 2/2 | 4.17s |
| #48 | Gemma 4 31B none | 10.0 | 6.9 | 2/2 | 2.25s | |
| #49 | Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 none | Qwen | 10.0 | 6.8 | 2/2 | 1.89s |
| #50 | Hunter Alpha medium | OpenRouter | 10.0 | 6.7 | 2/2 | 23.2s |