Data parsing and extraction Ranking
See which AI models perform best on Data parsing and extraction, which ones stay reliable, and where the biggest gaps appear.
210/210
Filter models
No models match the current search and filters.
| Rank | Model | Company | Data parsing and extraction Score | Score | Total Cost | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #13 | GPT-5.3-Codex medium | OpenAI | 10.0 | 8.9 | $0.920 | 2/2 | 3.07s |
| #15 | Claude Opus 4.7 medium | Anthropic | 10.0 | 8.7 | $1.477 | 2/2 | 2.37s |
| #16 | Muse Spark 1.1 medium | Meta | 10.0 | 8.6 | $1.357 | 2/2 | 4.96s |
| #17 | Claude Fable 5 medium | Anthropic | 10.0 | 8.6 | $3.478 | 2/2 | 7.18s |
| #18 | GPT-5.4 medium | OpenAI | 10.0 | 8.5 | $1.533 | 2/2 | 5.32s |
| #19 | Qwen3.6 Max Preview medium | Qwen | 10.0 | 8.4 | $1.143 | 2/2 | 41.2s |
| #20 | Grok 4.5 low | X AI | 10.0 | 8.4 | $0.935 | 2/2 | 3.44s |
| #21 | GPT-5.2 medium | OpenAI | 10.0 | 8.4 | $0.951 | 2/2 | 3.15s |
| #22 | Grok 4.5 medium | X AI | 10.0 | 8.3 | $1.928 | 2/2 | 6.29s |
| #23 | Claude Sonnet 5 medium | Anthropic | 10.0 | 8.3 | $0.922 | 2/2 | 3.16s |
| #24 | Muse Spark 1.1 low | Meta | 10.0 | 8.3 | $0.647 | 2/2 | 3.22s |
| #25 | Gemini 2.5 Flash medium | 10.0 | 8.2 | $0.643 | 2/2 | 4.06s | |
| #26 | GPT-5 Mini medium | OpenAI | 10.0 | 8.1 | $0.237 | 2/2 | 12.6s |
| #27 | Muse Spark 1.1 high | Meta | 10.0 | 8.1 | $1.694 | 2/2 | 8.40s |
| #28 | Inkling high | Thinkingmachines | 10.0 | 8.0 | $1.006 | 2/2 | 8.19s |