- Score
- 9.4 (+0.18 points)
- Total Cost (Current Price)
- $0.183 · 90.6% cheaper
- Response Time (avg)
- 6.24s · 83.9% faster
Gemini 3.8 Flash still tops Gemini 4 Argon, Carbon and Hydrogen in our tests →
Summary
Gemini 4 Carbon scores 9.2 on AI BENCHY and ranks #43. It has 8.6 reliability, a 95.7% pass rate, $1.933 total cost, and 38.78s average response time.
What makes Gemini 4 Carbon unique: It stands out most in Domain specific, where it ranks #2, while Combined is its weakest area at #16.
Recommended alternatives
We recommend choosing one of these models instead:
- Score
- 9.3 (+0.13 points)
- Total Cost (Current Price)
- $0.221 · 88.6% cheaper
- Response Time (avg)
- 6.05s · 84.4% faster
- Score
- 9.2 (+0.06 points)
- Total Cost (Current Price)
- $0.156 · 91.9% cheaper
- Response Time (avg)
- 11.67s · 69.9% faster
Model facts
Researched on 2026-11-12
- Parameters
- ~1.2T total (~20B active)
- Architecture
- MoE
- Availability
- Closed
- License
- -
Best estimate from public evidence; the vendor did not disclose every value. Google does not disclose size or architecture for this frontier Gemini 4 checkpoint. The 1.2T total / 20B active MoE values are a low-confidence estimate carried from the Gemini 4 Argon catalog entry, not vendor-reported. API-only. OpenRouter declares mandatory reasoning with low, medium and high efforts, medium default. The fallback release date records this onboarding request date.
9.2
Consistency
8.9
8.6
$1.933
Total Output Tokens
131,948
Total Input Tokens
306,396
Input Price
$2.000 / 1M
Output Price
$10.000 / 1M
Cache Read Price
$0.100 / 1M
Cache Write Price
$0.188 / 1M
Cache prices apply to input tokens. Reads reuse cached prompts; writes store them and can cost extra. Output tokens use the output price.
Flaky tests
3
Flaky tests had mixed outcomes across runs (at least one pass and one fail).
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#43 Gemini 4 Carbon
medium- Cost
- $0.203
- Time
- 336.6s
- Tokens
- 20,353 tok
Charts
Choose the first model, then click a second model to open a side-by-side page.
Top Models by Score
Score vs Total Cost
Response Time (avg)
Score vs Response Time (avg)
Total Output Tokens
Score vs Total Output Tokens
Quick Compare
Category Breakdown
| Category | Score | Consistency | Tests Correct |
|---|---|---|---|
| Agentic | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Anti-AI Tricks | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Coding | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Combined | 4.7 | 1.6 | |
| Data parsing and extraction | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Domain specific | 8.2 | 7.2 | |
| General Intelligence | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Instructions following | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Puzzle Solving | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Tool Calling | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Trivia | 10.0 | 10.0 |