指令遵循 排名
看看哪些 AI 模型在 指令遵循 上表现最好，哪些更稳定，以及差距主要出现在哪里。 排序方式: 总成本 ↓.
455/455
筛选模型
没有模型匹配当前搜索和筛选条件。
| 排名 | 模型 | 公司 | 指令遵循 得分 | 分数 | 总成本 | 测试正确 | 响应时间（平均） |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #264 | Claude Opus 4.6 medium | Anthropic | 1.0 | 0.6 | $2.961 | 2/2 | 2.43s |
| #125 | Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B high | Qwen | 1.0 | 0.8 | $2.949 | 2/2 | 11.4s |
| #166 | Grok 4.7 medium | X AI | 0.8 | 0.7 | $2.938 | 1/2 | 6.68s |
| #28 | Claude Opus 5 medium | Anthropic | 1.0 | 0.9 | $2.870 | 2/2 | 4.16s |
| #181 | Claude Opus 5 none | Anthropic | 1.0 | 0.7 | $2.766 | 2/2 | 2.81s |
| #95 | Gemini 3.5 Flash high | 1.0 | 0.8 | $2.737 | 2/2 | 3.35s | |
| #21 | GPT-6 Astra medium | OpenAI | 1.0 | 0.9 | $2.707 | 2/2 | 2.86s |
| #103 | Grok 4.5 high | X AI | 1.0 | 0.8 | $2.687 | 2/2 | 6.23s |
| #41 | Muse Wonder low | Meta | 0.7 | 0.9 | $2.637 | 1/2 | 2.08s |
| #79 | Grok 4.6 high | X AI | 1.0 | 0.9 | $2.629 | 2/2 | 13.8s |
| #90 | Muse Spark 1.1 high | Meta | 0.6 | 0.8 | $2.570 | 1/2 | 7.81s |
| #199 | Ember-1 high | Fireworks | 0.7 | 0.7 | $2.405 | 1/2 | 33.4s |
| #51 | Claude Opus 5 low | Anthropic | 1.0 | 0.9 | $2.350 | 2/2 | 4.13s |
| #203 | Claude Opus 4.8 none | Anthropic | 1.0 | 0.7 | $2.334 | 2/2 | 1.37s |
| #395 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview high | 1.0 | 0.4 | $2.310 | 2/2 | 64.0s |