指令遵循 排名
看看哪些 AI 模型在 指令遵循 上表现最好，哪些更稳定，以及差距主要出现在哪里。 排序方式: 总成本 ↓.
216/216
筛选模型
没有模型匹配当前搜索和筛选条件。
| 排名 | 模型 | 公司 | 指令遵循 得分 | 分数 | 总成本 | 测试正确 | 响应时间（平均） |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #76 | Qwen3.5-122B-A10B medium | Qwen | 10.0 | 7.1 | $1.046 | 2/2 | 9.88s |
| #72 | Kimi K2.6 medium | Moonshot AI | 10.0 | 7.2 | $1.036 | 2/2 | 12.5s |
| #48 | GPT-5.6 Luna high | OpenAI | 9.9 | 7.7 | $1.017 | 2/2 | 1.79s |
| #32 | Inkling high | Thinkingmachines | 9.8 | 8.0 | $1.006 | 2/2 | 7.00s |
| #5 | GPT-5.6 Sol low | OpenAI | 10.0 | 9.5 | $0.971 | 2/2 | 2.27s |
| #24 | GPT-5.2 medium | OpenAI | 9.9 | 8.4 | $0.951 | 2/2 | 3.12s |
| #23 | Grok 4.5 low | X AI | 9.8 | 8.4 | $0.935 | 2/2 | 2.80s |
| #26 | Claude Sonnet 5 medium | Anthropic | 9.9 | 8.3 | $0.922 | 2/2 | 3.10s |
| #16 | GPT-5.3-Codex medium | OpenAI | 10.0 | 8.9 | $0.920 | 2/2 | 3.04s |
| #125 | Qwen3.5-35B-A3B medium | Qwen | 10.0 | 6.2 | $0.837 | 2/2 | 24.4s |
| #1 | Gemini 3.6 Flash medium | 9.9 | 9.9 | $0.831 | 2/2 | 2.77s | |
| #35 | GLM 5.2 high | Z.ai | 10.0 | 8.0 | $0.817 | 2/2 | 4.26s |
| #77 | Grok 4.3 medium | X AI | 9.8 | 7.1 | $0.779 | 2/2 | 18.6s |
| #105 | Qwen3.6 27B medium | Qwen | 10.0 | 6.5 | $0.779 | 2/2 | 38.0s |
| #79 | Grok 4.20 medium | X AI | 9.8 | 7.1 | $0.777 | 2/2 | 4.26s |