指令遵循 排名
看看哪些 AI 模型在 指令遵循 上表现最好，哪些更稳定，以及差距主要出现在哪里。 排序方式: 总成本 ↑.
210/210
筛选模型
没有模型匹配当前搜索和筛选条件。
| 排名 | 模型 | 公司 | 指令遵循 得分 | 分数 | 总成本 | 测试正确 | 响应时间（平均） |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #205 | Laguna Xs.2 none | Poolside | 6.5 | 3.8 | $0.004 | 1/2 | 439ms |
| #201 | Granite 4.1 8B none | IBM Granite | 3.6 | 4.0 | $0.007 | 0/2 | 344ms |
| #160 | Laguna XS 2.1 none | Poolside | 3.8 | 5.3 | $0.008 | 0/2 | 364ms |
| #203 | Grok 4.1 Fast none | X AI | 3.0 | 3.8 | $0.008 | 0/2 | 685ms |
| #183 | Trinity Large Preview none | Arcee AI | 3.5 | 4.8 | $0.008 | 0/2 | 822ms |
| #177 | Nemotron 3 Super none | NVIDIA | 6.3 | 4.9 | $0.008 | 1/2 | 804ms |
| #192 | Laguna M.1 none | Poolside | 6.3 | 4.4 | $0.009 | 1/2 | 683ms |
| #206 | gpt-oss-120b none | OpenAI | 9.8 | 3.7 | $0.010 | 2/2 | 5.06s |
| #174 | GPT-4o-mini none | OpenAI | 6.3 | 5.0 | $0.010 | 1/2 | 1.11s |
| #156 | Gemma 4 26B A4B none | 6.3 | 5.5 | $0.015 | 1/2 | 690ms | |
| #153 | Hy3 preview low | Tencent | 10.0 | 5.5 | $0.015 | 2/2 | 16.0s |
| #198 | Laguna Xs.2 medium | Poolside | 10.0 | 4.1 | $0.015 | 2/2 | 1.68s |
| #162 | Ling-2.6-1T none | Inclusionai | 6.4 | 5.3 | $0.016 | 1/2 | 5.36s |
| #176 | GLM 4.7 Flash none | Z.ai | 6.5 | 4.9 | $0.016 | 1/2 | 888ms |
| #118 | Gemini 2.5 Flash none | 10.0 | 6.2 | $0.017 | 2/2 | 590ms |