指令遵循 排名
看看哪些 AI 模型在 指令遵循 上表现最好，哪些更稳定，以及差距主要出现在哪里。 排序方式: 测试正确 ↑.
455/455
筛选模型
没有模型匹配当前搜索和筛选条件。
| 排名 | 模型 | 公司 | 指令遵循 得分 | 分数 | 总成本 | 测试正确 | 响应时间（平均） |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #309 | Dots 3 Note Preview medium | Dots Studio | 0.8 | 0.6 | $0.000 | 1/2 | 7.77s |
| #310 | Gemma 4 31B none | 0.7 | 0.6 | $0.031 | 1/2 | 2.84s | |
| #312 | GPT-5.4 none | OpenAI | 0.7 | 0.6 | $0.690 | 1/2 | 1.07s |
| #313 | Solar Pro 4 none | Upstage | 0.6 | 0.6 | $0.022 | 1/2 | 1.67s |
| #316 | Qwen3.5-35B-A3B none | Qwen | 0.6 | 0.6 | $0.120 | 1/2 | 809ms |
| #318 | Nemotron 3 Super medium | NVIDIA | 0.7 | 0.6 | $0.081 | 1/2 | 6.97s |
| #319 | Kimi K2.6 none | Moonshot AI | 0.7 | 0.5 | $0.486 | 1/2 | 1.64s |
| #320 | Ling 3.1 Flash none | Inclusionai | 0.8 | 0.5 | $0.000 | 1/2 | 1.22s |
| #322 | GPT-6 Luna none | OpenAI | 0.6 | 0.5 | $0.026 | 1/2 | 17.0s |
| #323 | Gemma 4 26B A4B none | 0.6 | 0.5 | $0.031 | 1/2 | 690ms | |
| #325 | Seed-2.0-Code none | Bytedance Seed | 0.6 | 0.5 | $0.257 | 1/2 | 1.80s |
| #327 | Qwen3.8 27B none | Qwen | 0.6 | 0.5 | ~$0.010 | 1/2 | 582ms |
| #330 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash none | Xiaomi | 0.7 | 0.5 | $0.060 | 1/2 | 810ms |
| #331 | Step 3.5 Flash medium | Stepfun | 0.8 | 0.5 | $0.105 | 1/2 | 4.78s |
| #332 | Ember-1 none | Fireworks | 0.6 | 0.5 | $0.786 | 1/2 | 31.0s |