通用智能 排名
看看哪些 AI 模型在 通用智能 上表现最好，哪些更稳定，以及差距主要出现在哪里。 排序方式: 总成本 ↓.
461/461
筛选模型
没有模型匹配当前搜索和筛选条件。
| 排名 | 模型 | 公司 | 通用智能 得分 | 分数 | 总成本 | 测试正确 | 响应时间（平均） |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #270 | Claude Opus 4.6 medium | Anthropic | 1.0 | 0.6 | $2.961 | 1/1 | 5.04s |
| #131 | Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B high | Qwen | 0.6 | 0.8 | $2.949 | 0/1 | 11.4s |
| #172 | Grok 4.7 medium | X AI | 0.5 | 0.7 | $2.938 | 0/1 | 32.4s |
| #31 | Claude Opus 5 medium | Anthropic | 1.0 | 0.9 | $2.870 | 1/1 | 3.56s |
| #187 | Claude Opus 5 none | Anthropic | 1.0 | 0.7 | $2.766 | 1/1 | 3.70s |
| #101 | Gemini 3.5 Flash high | 1.0 | 0.8 | $2.737 | 1/1 | 3.63s | |
| #23 | GPT-6 Astra medium | OpenAI | 1.0 | 0.9 | $2.707 | 1/1 | 4.13s |
| #109 | Grok 4.5 high | X AI | 0.5 | 0.8 | $2.687 | 0/1 | 9.82s |
| #46 | Muse Wonder low | Meta | 1.0 | 0.9 | $2.637 | 1/1 | 3.94s |
| #85 | Grok 4.6 high | X AI | 1.0 | 0.9 | $2.629 | 1/1 | 19.5s |
| #96 | Muse Spark 1.1 high | Meta | 1.0 | 0.8 | $2.570 | 1/1 | 7.73s |
| #205 | Ember-1 high | Fireworks | 1.0 | 0.7 | $2.405 | 1/1 | 4.49s |
| #56 | Claude Opus 5 low | Anthropic | 1.0 | 0.9 | $2.350 | 1/1 | 3.76s |
| #209 | Claude Opus 4.8 none | Anthropic | 1.0 | 0.7 | $2.334 | 1/1 | 3.48s |
| #401 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview high | 1.0 | 0.4 | $2.310 | 1/1 | 5.25s |