领域专项 排名
看看哪些 AI 模型在 领域专项 上表现最好，哪些更稳定，以及差距主要出现在哪里。 排序方式: 指标 ↑.
316/316
筛选模型
没有模型匹配当前搜索和筛选条件。
| 排名 | 模型 | 公司 | 领域专项 得分 | 分数 | 总成本 | 测试正确 | 响应时间（平均） |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #20 | Claude Opus 5 high | Anthropic | 3.0 | 9.2 | $3.070 | 0/3 | 104.2s |
| #28 | Qwen3.8 Max medium | Qwen | 3.0 | 9.0 | $0.771 | 0/3 | 41.8s |
| #66 | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 low | DeepSeek | 3.0 | 8.0 | $0.044 | 0/3 | 255.5s |
| #72 | GPT-5.2 Chat none | OpenAI | 3.0 | 7.9 | $0.594 | 0/3 | 23.7s |
| #80 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 medium | Anthropic | 3.0 | 7.8 | $2.126 | 0/3 | 58.4s |
| #87 | Claude Opus 4.6 medium | Anthropic | 3.0 | 7.7 | $2.961 | 0/3 | 42.5s |
| #92 | Solar Pro 4 xhigh | Upstage | 3.0 | 7.6 | $0.050 | 0/3 | 287.7s |
| #109 | LongCat 2.0 medium | Meituan | 3.0 | 7.4 | $0.499 | 0/3 | 390.6s |
| #111 | Grok 4.6 low | X AI | 3.0 | 7.4 | $0.449 | 0/3 | 18.2s |
| #116 | GLM 5.3 Flash high | Z.ai | 3.0 | 7.3 | $0.029 | 0/3 | 85.9s |
| #134 | GLM 5.1 medium | Z.ai | 3.0 | 7.0 | $0.727 | 0/3 | 114.0s |
| #138 | Seed-2.0-Mini medium | Bytedance Seed | 3.0 | 7.0 | $0.116 | 0/3 | 103.4s |
| #149 | Solar Pro 4 medium | Upstage | 3.0 | 6.8 | $0.047 | 0/3 | 201.8s |
| #150 | DeepSeek V4 Pro none | DeepSeek | 3.0 | 6.8 | $0.220 | 0/3 | 4.91s |
| #165 | Inkling Small medium | Thinkingmachines | 3.0 | 6.6 | $0.113 | 0/3 | 7.65s |