领域专项 排名
看看哪些 AI 模型在 领域专项 上表现最好，哪些更稳定，以及差距主要出现在哪里。 排序方式: 总成本 ↑.
451/451
筛选模型
没有模型匹配当前搜索和筛选条件。
| 排名 | 模型 | 公司 | 领域专项 得分 | 分数 | 总成本 | 测试正确 | 响应时间（平均） |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #31 | Claude Opus 5.5 medium | Anthropic | 0.8 | 0.9 | $1.804 | 2/3 | 21.3s |
| #23 | GPT-5.5 low | OpenAI | 0.5 | 0.9 | $1.822 | 1/3 | 28.2s |
| #326 | Hy4 preview low | Tencent | 0.5 | 0.5 | $1.844 | 0/3 | 470.2s |
| #59 | Pareto 26.9 default | Unbiased | 0.6 | 0.9 | $1.864 | 1/3 | 61.0s |
| #40 | Muse Spark 1.3 high | Meta | 0.3 | 0.9 | $1.891 | 0/3 | 174.6s |
| #43 | Seed 2.1 Turbo high | Bytedance Seed | 0.3 | 0.9 | $1.892 | 0/3 | 506.2s |
| #2 | Gemini 3.8 Flash high | 0.8 | 1.0 | $1.927 | 2/3 | 131.3s | |
| #156 | Grok 4.7 low | X AI | 0.5 | 0.7 | $1.933 | 1/3 | 159.1s |
| #55 | Muse Spark 1.2 high | Meta | 0.4 | 0.9 | $2.018 | 0/3 | 108.9s |
| #69 | Seed 2.1 Turbo medium | Bytedance Seed | 0.3 | 0.9 | $2.042 | 0/3 | 656.0s |
| #375 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite high | 0.4 | 0.5 | $2.044 | 0/3 | 139.9s | |
| #45 | Muse Spark Open xhigh | Meta | 0.3 | 0.9 | $2.081 | 0/3 | 341.5s |
| #242 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 medium | Anthropic | 0.3 | 0.6 | $2.126 | 0/3 | 58.4s |
| #25 | Claude Opus 5.5 high | Anthropic | 0.5 | 0.9 | $2.133 | 1/3 | 30.1s |
| #14 | GPT-6 Astra low | OpenAI | 0.8 | 1.0 | $2.160 | 2/3 | 13.9s |