领域专项 排名
看看哪些 AI 模型在 领域专项 上表现最好，哪些更稳定，以及差距主要出现在哪里。 排序方式: 响应时间（平均） ↑.
316/316
筛选模型
没有模型匹配当前搜索和筛选条件。
| 排名 | 模型 | 公司 | 领域专项 得分 | 分数 | 总成本 | 测试正确 | 响应时间（平均） |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #139 | Kimi K2.5 medium | Moonshot AI | 2.9 | 7.0 | $0.479 | 0/3 | 111.6s |
| #114 | GLM 5.3 high | Z.ai | 2.9 | 7.3 | $0.403 | 0/3 | 112.3s |
| #134 | GLM 5.1 medium | Z.ai | 3.0 | 7.0 | $0.727 | 0/3 | 114.0s |
| #89 | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 high | DeepSeek | 3.6 | 7.6 | $0.042 | 0/3 | 115.4s |
| #283 | Grok 4.1 Fast medium | X AI | 5.8 | 4.7 | $0.069 | 1/3 | 121.8s |
| #204 | GPT-5 Nano medium | OpenAI | 3.4 | 6.0 | $0.118 | 0/3 | 124.1s |
| #194 | Trinity Large Thinking medium | Arcee AI | 5.3 | 6.1 | $0.756 | 1/3 | 124.2s |
| #68 | GLM 5.2 high | Z.ai | 3.1 | 8.0 | $1.188 | 0/3 | 126.8s |
| #250 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview high | 5.3 | 5.3 | $2.310 | 1/3 | 127.6s | |
| #285 | Cobuddy medium | Baidu | 2.9 | 4.7 | $0.000 | 0/3 | 128.2s |
| #2 | Gemini 3.8 Flash high | 8.2 | 9.9 | $1.595 | 2/3 | 131.3s | |
| #34 | Muse Spark 1.3 medium | Meta | 3.5 | 8.8 | $1.469 | 0/3 | 132.3s |
| #178 | MiMo-V2.5 medium | Xiaomi | 3.6 | 6.4 | $0.104 | 0/3 | 137.7s |
| #224 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite high | 3.6 | 5.6 | $2.044 | 0/3 | 139.9s | |
| #199 | Trinity Large Thinking low | Arcee AI | 2.9 | 6.0 | $0.625 | 0/3 | 140.3s |