领域专项 排名
看看哪些 AI 模型在 领域专项 上表现最好，哪些更稳定，以及差距主要出现在哪里。 排序方式: 总成本 ↑.
316/316
筛选模型
没有模型匹配当前搜索和筛选条件。
| 排名 | 模型 | 公司 | 领域专项 得分 | 分数 | 总成本 | 测试正确 | 响应时间（平均） |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #115 | KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 low | Kwaipilot | 3.5 | 7.3 | $0.400 | 0/3 | 22.9s |
| #114 | GLM 5.3 high | Z.ai | 2.9 | 7.3 | $0.403 | 0/3 | 112.3s |
| #157 | LongCat 2.0 low | Meituan | 2.9 | 6.7 | $0.412 | 0/3 | 183.6s |
| #76 | Qwen3.6 Plus medium | Qwen | 2.9 | 7.8 | $0.418 | 0/3 | 46.4s |
| #96 | GPT-5.6 Terra low | OpenAI | 5.3 | 7.5 | $0.420 | 1/3 | 9.34s |
| #7 | Gemini 3.6 Flash medium | 5.8 | 9.8 | $0.427 | 1/3 | 22.0s | |
| #15 | GPT-5.6 Sol high | OpenAI | 5.3 | 9.4 | $0.446 | 1/3 | 37.7s |
| #111 | Grok 4.6 low | X AI | 3.0 | 7.4 | $0.449 | 0/3 | 18.2s |
| #33 | Gemini 3.5 Flash low | 5.3 | 8.8 | $0.449 | 1/3 | 4.89s | |
| #159 | GLM 5V Turbo medium | Z.ai | 5.3 | 6.7 | $0.457 | 1/3 | 38.1s |
| #99 | Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 medium | Qwen | 5.3 | 7.5 | $0.459 | 1/3 | 56.0s |
| #63 | Muse Glimmer 30B xhigh | Meta | 2.9 | 8.1 | $0.471 | 0/3 | 142.6s |
| #88 | DeepSeek V4 Pro high | DeepSeek | 3.6 | 7.7 | $0.476 | 0/3 | 249.5s |
| #140 | KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 medium | Kwaipilot | 2.9 | 6.9 | $0.478 | 0/3 | 35.1s |
| #139 | Kimi K2.5 medium | Moonshot AI | 2.9 | 7.0 | $0.479 | 0/3 | 111.6s |