领域专项 排名
看看哪些 AI 模型在 领域专项 上表现最好，哪些更稳定，以及差距主要出现在哪里。 排序方式: 总成本 ↑.
210/210
筛选模型
没有模型匹配当前搜索和筛选条件。
| 排名 | 模型 | 公司 | 领域专项 得分 | 分数 | 总成本 | 测试正确 | 响应时间（平均） |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #58 | Qwen3.5-27B medium | Qwen | 5.3 | 7.4 | $1.627 | 1/3 | 79.5s |
| #27 | Muse Spark 1.1 high | Meta | 3.5 | 8.1 | $1.694 | 0/3 | 67.4s |
| #12 | Grok 4.5 high | X AI | 3.6 | 8.9 | $1.707 | 0/3 | 332.1s |
| #22 | Grok 4.5 medium | X AI | 2.9 | 8.3 | $1.928 | 0/3 | 198.9s |
| #14 | Claude Opus 4.8 medium | Anthropic | 5.3 | 8.8 | $1.931 | 1/3 | 14.6s |
| #2 | Gemini 3.5 Flash high | 7.6 | 9.5 | $1.976 | 2/3 | 14.1s | |
| #143 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite high | 3.6 | 5.6 | $2.044 | 0/3 | 139.9s | |
| #40 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 medium | Anthropic | 2.9 | 7.8 | $2.057 | 0/3 | 0ms |
| #41 | Claude Opus 4.8 low | Anthropic | 5.3 | 7.8 | $2.077 | 1/3 | 45.5s |
| #163 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview high | 5.3 | 5.3 | $2.310 | 1/3 | 127.6s | |
| #43 | Claude Opus 4.6 medium | Anthropic | 3.0 | 7.7 | $3.059 | 0/3 | 83.4s |
| #33 | Kimi K3 max | Moonshot AI | 5.9 | 8.0 | $3.112 | 1/3 | 490.1s |
| #17 | Claude Fable 5 medium | Anthropic | 5.3 | 8.6 | $3.478 | 1/3 | 53.4s |
| #10 | GPT-5.5 medium | OpenAI | 5.3 | 9.0 | $4.137 | 1/3 | 164.1s |
| #181 | Grok 4.20 Multi Agent Beta medium | X AI | 2.9 | 4.8 | $5.599 | 0/3 | 24.7s |