数据解析与提取 排名
看看哪些 AI 模型在 数据解析与提取 上表现最好，哪些更稳定，以及差距主要出现在哪里。
442/442
筛选模型
没有模型匹配当前搜索和筛选条件。
| 排名 | 模型 | 公司 | 数据解析与提取 得分 | 分数 | 总成本 | 测试正确 | 响应时间（平均） |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #31 | Claude Opus 5.5 medium | Anthropic | 1.0 | 0.9 | $1.804 | 2/2 | 12.7s |
| #32 | Muse Wonder medium | Meta | 1.0 | 0.9 | $3.397 | 2/2 | 6.12s |
| #33 | GPT-5.5 medium | OpenAI | 1.0 | 0.9 | $4.809 | 2/2 | 4.18s |
| #34 | Claude Sonnet 5.5 max | Anthropic | 1.0 | 0.9 | $8.557 | 2/2 | 16.1s |
| #35 | Qwen3.8 MAX medium | Qwen | 1.0 | 0.9 | $1.181 | 2/2 | 8.72s |
| #36 | Qwen3.8 Max (0902) high | Qwen | 1.0 | 0.9 | $3.306 | 2/2 | 16.4s |
| #37 | GPT-5.3-Codex medium | OpenAI | 1.0 | 0.9 | $1.318 | 2/2 | 3.07s |
| #38 | Claude Haiku 5.5 xhigh | Anthropic | 1.0 | 0.9 | $0.140 | 2/2 | 3.65s |
| #39 | Muse Spark 1.3 high | Meta | 1.0 | 0.9 | $1.891 | 2/2 | 7.01s |
| #40 | Muse Wonder low | Meta | 1.0 | 0.9 | $2.637 | 2/2 | 4.27s |
| #41 | Pareto default | Unbiased | 1.0 | 0.9 | $1.520 | 2/2 | 2.57s |
| #42 | Seed 2.1 Turbo high | Bytedance Seed | 1.0 | 0.9 | $1.892 | 2/2 | 33.7s |
| #43 | Muse Wonder minimal | Meta | 1.0 | 0.9 | $1.639 | 2/2 | 3.31s |
| #44 | Muse Spark Open xhigh | Meta | 1.0 | 0.9 | $2.081 | 2/2 | 16.4s |
| #45 | Gemini 3.5 Flash low | 1.0 | 0.9 | $0.752 | 2/2 | 1.81s |