数据解析与提取 排名
看看哪些 AI 模型在 数据解析与提取 上表现最好，哪些更稳定，以及差距主要出现在哪里。 排序方式: 响应时间（平均） ↓.
442/442
筛选模型
没有模型匹配当前搜索和筛选条件。
| 排名 | 模型 | 公司 | 数据解析与提取 得分 | 分数 | 总成本 | 测试正确 | 响应时间（平均） |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #398 | Xing4.0 29b A4b medium | Xingchen AGI | 0.3 | 0.4 | $0.000 | 0/2 | 147.5s |
| #408 | Command A+ medium | Cohere | 0.3 | 0.3 | $0.064 | 0/2 | 92.9s |
| #317 | Hy4 preview low | Tencent | 0.9 | 0.5 | $1.844 | 1/2 | 88.5s |
| #390 | Qwen3.5-9B medium | Qwen | 0.4 | 0.4 | $0.106 | 0/2 | 87.3s |
| #414 | Command A+ high | Cohere | 0.3 | 0.3 | $0.079 | 0/2 | 86.2s |
| #418 | Command A+ low | Cohere | 0.3 | 0.3 | $0.073 | 0/2 | 85.4s |
| #363 | Qwen3 Coder Next medium | Qwen | 0.6 | 0.5 | $0.071 | 1/2 | 81.8s |
| #297 | Dots 3 Note Preview medium | Dots Studio | 0.4 | 0.6 | $0.000 | 0/2 | 78.5s |
| #417 | Command A+ none | Cohere | 0.3 | 0.3 | $0.000 | 0/2 | 62.6s |
| #250 | Solar Pro 4 high | Upstage | 1.0 | 0.6 | $0.077 | 2/2 | 62.5s |
| #206 | Solar Pro 4 low | Upstage | 1.0 | 0.7 | $0.101 | 2/2 | 62.4s |
| #245 | Qwen3.5-35B-A3B medium | Qwen | 0.7 | 0.6 | $0.716 | 1/2 | 59.3s |
| #197 | Qwen3.5-Flash medium | Qwen | 0.7 | 0.7 | $0.184 | 1/2 | 57.0s |
| #362 | Granite 4.2 8B high | IBM Granite | 0.4 | 0.5 | $0.111 | 0/2 | 56.5s |
| #237 | Kimi K2.5 medium | Moonshot AI | 1.0 | 0.6 | $0.841 | 2/2 | 49.8s |