数据解析与提取 排名
看看哪些 AI 模型在 数据解析与提取 上表现最好，哪些更稳定，以及差距主要出现在哪里。 排序方式: 测试正确 ↓.
451/451
筛选模型
没有模型匹配当前搜索和筛选条件。
| 排名 | 模型 | 公司 | 数据解析与提取 得分 | 分数 | 总成本 | 测试正确 | 响应时间（平均） |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #244 | Kimi K2.5 medium | Moonshot AI | 1.0 | 0.6 | $0.841 | 2/2 | 49.8s |
| #245 | Beam 1.0 501B A23B low | Reflection | 1.0 | 0.6 | $0.432 | 2/2 | 1.19s |
| #246 | Mercury 2.5 medium | Inception | 1.0 | 0.6 | $0.034 | 2/2 | 2.57s |
| #247 | Gemini 3.5 Flash minimal | 1.0 | 0.6 | $0.508 | 2/2 | 1.66s | |
| #251 | LongCat 2.0 none | Meituan | 1.0 | 0.6 | $0.104 | 2/2 | 2.36s |
| #254 | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite low | 1.0 | 0.6 | $0.183 | 2/2 | 859ms | |
| #255 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview low | 1.0 | 0.6 | $0.736 | 2/2 | 3.00s | |
| #257 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite low | 1.0 | 0.6 | $0.717 | 2/2 | 1.44s | |
| #258 | Solar Pro 4 high | Upstage | 1.0 | 0.6 | $0.077 | 2/2 | 62.5s |
| #259 | Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 none | Qwen | 1.0 | 0.6 | $0.176 | 2/2 | 1.89s |
| #260 | Ling 3.1 Flash low | Inclusionai | 1.0 | 0.6 | $0.000 | 2/2 | 21.8s |
| #261 | Claude Opus 4.6 medium | Anthropic | 1.0 | 0.6 | $2.961 | 2/2 | 7.37s |
| #262 | Space Bunny Alpha medium | Stealth | 1.0 | 0.6 | $0.000 | 2/2 | 2.10s |
| #263 | DeepSeek V3.2 medium | DeepSeek | 1.0 | 0.6 | $0.152 | 2/2 | 36.1s |
| #265 | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 none | DeepSeek | 1.0 | 0.6 | $0.149 | 2/2 | 23.8s |