综合 排名
看看哪些 AI 模型在 综合 上表现最好，哪些更稳定，以及差距主要出现在哪里。 排序方式: 响应时间（平均） ↓.
451/451
筛选模型
没有模型匹配当前搜索和筛选条件。
| 排名 | 模型 | 公司 | 综合 得分 | 分数 | 总成本 | 测试正确 | 响应时间（平均） |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #377 | Laguna S 2.1 low | Poolside | 0.3 | 0.5 | $0.108 | 0/2 | 412.5s |
| #43 | Seed 2.1 Turbo high | Bytedance Seed | 1.0 | 0.9 | $1.892 | 2/2 | 408.8s |
| #69 | Seed 2.1 Turbo medium | Bytedance Seed | 1.0 | 0.9 | $2.042 | 2/2 | 400.3s |
| #149 | Mistral Large 4 high | Mistral | 1.0 | 0.8 | $1.391 | 2/2 | 391.9s |
| #275 | Trinity Large Thinking medium | Arcee AI | 0.3 | 0.6 | $0.862 | 0/2 | 382.7s |
| #29 | Seed 2.1 Turbo low | Bytedance Seed | 1.0 | 0.9 | $1.645 | 2/2 | 360.0s |
| #211 | Solar Pro 4 low | Upstage | 0.6 | 0.7 | $0.101 | 1/2 | 358.1s |
| #125 | Ling 3.1 Flash high | Inclusionai | 0.6 | 0.8 | $0.000 | 1/2 | 351.2s |
| #90 | GLM 5.2 high | Z.ai | 1.0 | 0.8 | $4.632 | 2/2 | 321.5s |
| #221 | Qwen3.7 Flash medium | Qwen | 0.6 | 0.7 | $0.076 | 1/2 | 314.2s |
| #190 | Qwen3.5-122B-A10B medium | Qwen | 0.6 | 0.7 | $1.152 | 1/2 | 313.5s |
| #97 | Ling 3.1 Flash medium | Inclusionai | 0.7 | 0.8 | $0.000 | 1/2 | 306.5s |
| #152 | Qwen3.6 Flash medium | Qwen | 0.7 | 0.7 | $0.783 | 1/2 | 299.2s |
| #332 | Granite 4.2 8B low | IBM Granite | 0.3 | 0.5 | $0.036 | 0/2 | 298.2s |
| #241 | Solar Pro 4 medium | Upstage | 0.6 | 0.6 | $0.098 | 1/2 | 294.8s |