综合 排名
看看哪些 AI 模型在 综合 上表现最好，哪些更稳定，以及差距主要出现在哪里。 排序方式: 总成本 ↑.
316/316
筛选模型
没有模型匹配当前搜索和筛选条件。
| 排名 | 模型 | 公司 | 综合 得分 | 分数 | 总成本 | 测试正确 | 响应时间（平均） |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #196 | Gemma 4 31B none | 3.8 | 6.1 | $0.016 | 0/2 | 30.0s | |
| #200 | Gemini 2.5 Flash none | 3.0 | 6.0 | $0.017 | 0/2 | 61.2s | |
| #270 | Mercury 2.5 Preview none | Inception | 3.0 | 4.9 | $0.018 | 0/2 | 31.3s |
| #190 | Qwen3.7 Flash none | Qwen | 3.8 | 6.1 | $0.019 | 0/2 | 94.6s |
| #189 | gpt-oss-120b medium | OpenAI | 6.5 | 6.1 | $0.020 | 1/2 | 24.0s |
| #315 | Step 3.5 Flash none | Stepfun | 1.5 | 2.3 | $0.020 | 0/1 | 0ms |
| #261 | Qwen3.5-9B none | Qwen | 3.0 | 5.1 | $0.021 | 0/2 | 194.0s |
| #179 | Ling-3.0-flash high | Inclusionai | 2.9 | 6.4 | $0.021 | 0/2 | 50.4s |
| #237 | Mimo V2 Omni none | Xiaomi | 1.5 | 5.5 | $0.021 | 0/1 | 5.96s |
| #256 | Mistral Small 4 none | Mistral | 3.0 | 5.1 | $0.022 | 0/2 | 7.44s |
| #290 | Laguna S 2.1 none | Poolside | 2.9 | 4.5 | $0.022 | 0/2 | 21.6s |
| #101 | Mercury 2.5 Preview medium | Inception | 6.5 | 7.5 | $0.024 | 1/2 | 13.9s |
| #301 | MiMo-V2-Flash none | Xiaomi | 1.5 | 4.0 | $0.025 | 0/1 | 2.87s |
| #260 | MiMo-V2.5 none | Xiaomi | 3.0 | 5.1 | $0.025 | 0/2 | 28.9s |
| #296 | Granite 4.2 8B none | IBM Granite | 3.0 | 4.3 | $0.026 | 0/2 | 424.3s |