编程 排名
看看哪些 AI 模型在 编程 上表现最好，哪些更稳定，以及差距主要出现在哪里。 排序方式: 总成本 ↓.
289/289
筛选模型
没有模型匹配当前搜索和筛选条件。
| 排名 | 模型 | 公司 | 编程 得分 | 分数 | 总成本 | 测试正确 | 响应时间（平均） |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #26 | Claude Opus 4.8 medium | Anthropic | 10.0 | 8.8 | $1.983 | 3/3 | 15.3s |
| #43 | Seed 2.1 Turbo medium | Bytedance Seed | 8.2 | 8.4 | $1.951 | 2/3 | 354.9s |
| #11 | Grok 4.6 high | X AI | 10.0 | 9.3 | $1.908 | 3/3 | 102.2s |
| #23 | Seed 2.1 Turbo high | Bytedance Seed | 10.0 | 8.9 | $1.797 | 3/3 | 336.0s |
| #30 | Muse Spark 1.2 high | Meta | 10.0 | 8.7 | $1.771 | 3/3 | 22.2s |
| #39 | Grok 4.6 medium | X AI | 8.2 | 8.4 | $1.713 | 2/3 | 120.0s |
| #52 | Muse Spark 1.1 high | Meta | 10.0 | 8.0 | $1.709 | 3/3 | 22.9s |
| #15 | Claude Opus 5 medium | Anthropic | 10.0 | 9.2 | $1.586 | 3/3 | 9.56s |
| #36 | GPT-5.4 medium | OpenAI | 8.8 | 8.5 | $1.560 | 2/3 | 44.4s |
| #81 | Claude Opus 5 none | Anthropic | 5.9 | 7.5 | $1.550 | 1/3 | 5.54s |
| #16 | Seed 2.1 Turbo low | Bytedance Seed | 10.0 | 9.1 | $1.546 | 3/3 | 360.8s |
| #29 | Claude Opus 4.7 medium | Anthropic | 7.6 | 8.7 | $1.476 | 2/3 | 13.0s |
| #32 | Muse Spark 1.1 medium | Meta | 10.0 | 8.6 | $1.420 | 3/3 | 15.7s |
| #12 | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview medium | 7.9 | 9.2 | $1.352 | 2/3 | 40.2s | |
| #31 | Muse Spark 1.2 medium | Meta | 10.0 | 8.6 | $1.339 | 3/3 | 17.5s |