反AI技巧 排名
看看哪些 AI 模型在 反AI技巧 上表现最好，哪些更稳定，以及差距主要出现在哪里。 排序方式: 总成本 ↑.
461/461
筛选模型
没有模型匹配当前搜索和筛选条件。
| 排名 | 模型 | 公司 | 反AI技巧 得分 | 分数 | 总成本 | 测试正确 | 响应时间（平均） |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #96 | Muse Spark 1.1 high | Meta | 0.7 | 0.8 | $2.570 | 2/4 | 8.60s |
| #85 | Grok 4.6 high | X AI | 1.0 | 0.9 | $2.629 | 4/4 | 14.4s |
| #46 | Muse Wonder low | Meta | 1.0 | 0.9 | $2.637 | 4/4 | 4.37s |
| #109 | Grok 4.5 high | X AI | 1.0 | 0.8 | $2.687 | 4/4 | 5.67s |
| #23 | GPT-6 Astra medium | OpenAI | 1.0 | 0.9 | $2.707 | 4/4 | 2.57s |
| #101 | Gemini 3.5 Flash high | 1.0 | 0.8 | $2.737 | 4/4 | 2.57s | |
| #187 | Claude Opus 5 none | Anthropic | 0.6 | 0.7 | $2.766 | 1/4 | 4.33s |
| #31 | Claude Opus 5 medium | Anthropic | 1.0 | 0.9 | $2.870 | 4/4 | 5.46s |
| #172 | Grok 4.7 medium | X AI | 1.0 | 0.7 | $2.938 | 4/4 | 16.0s |
| #131 | Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B high | Qwen | 1.0 | 0.8 | $2.949 | 4/4 | 24.2s |
| #270 | Claude Opus 4.6 medium | Anthropic | 0.6 | 0.6 | $2.961 | 2/4 | 7.45s |
| #136 | Grok 4.5 medium | X AI | 1.0 | 0.8 | $2.996 | 4/4 | 23.5s |
| #221 | Grok 4.7 high | X AI | 0.9 | 0.7 | $3.037 | 3/4 | 28.0s |
| #171 | Claude Fable 5.1 medium | Anthropic | 0.8 | 0.7 | $3.197 | 3/4 | 5.18s |
| #223 | Ember-1 max | Fireworks | 0.9 | 0.7 | $3.264 | 3/4 | 23.7s |