Categorie AI BENCHY
Clasament Combinat
Vezi ce modele AI se descurcă cel mai bine la Combinat, care rămân fiabile și unde apar cele mai mari diferențe. Sortează după: Metrică ↑.
| Rang | Model | Companie | Scor Combinat | Scor | Teste corecte | Timp de răspuns (mediu) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #8 | Claude Opus 4.7 none | Anthropic | 9.5 | 8.9 | 1/1 | 18.3s |
| #55 | GLM 5.1 medium | Z.ai | 9.5 | 7.3 | 1/1 | 43.1s |
| #68 | Claude Opus 4.8 none | Anthropic | 9.5 | 7.0 | 1/1 | 17.7s |
| #77 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 none | Anthropic | 9.5 | 6.8 | 1/1 | 23.8s |
| #113 | DeepSeek V4 Pro none | DeepSeek | 9.5 | 5.7 | 1/1 | 25.5s |
| #37 | Gemma 4 26B A4B medium | 9.6 | 7.6 | 1/1 | 73.5s | |
| #10 | Claude Opus 4.8 medium | Anthropic | 9.8 | 8.7 | 1/1 | 38.0s |
| #41 | Nemotron 3 Ultra 550b A55b medium | NVIDIA | 9.8 | 7.5 | 1/1 | 43.9s |
| #64 | MiMo-V2-Flash medium | Xiaomi | 9.8 | 7.2 | 1/1 | 75.7s |
| #70 | GPT-5.4 Nano medium | OpenAI | 9.8 | 7.0 | 1/1 | 24.1s |
| #1 | Gemini 3 Flash Preview medium | 10.0 | 9.8 | 1/1 | 22.4s | |
| #2 | Gemini 3.5 Flash high | 10.0 | 9.6 | 1/1 | 22.4s | |
| #3 | Gemini 3.5 Flash low | 10.0 | 9.4 | 1/1 | 6.44s | |
| #5 | Qwen3.7 Max medium | Qwen | 10.0 | 9.1 | 1/1 | 19.6s |
| #6 | GPT-5.5 low | OpenAI | 10.0 | 9.0 | 1/1 | 9.56s |