Categorie AI BENCHY
Clasament Programare
Vezi ce modele AI se descurcă cel mai bine la Programare, care rămân fiabile și unde apar cele mai mari diferențe. Sortează după: Timp de răspuns (mediu) ↓.
| Rang | Model | Companie | Scor Programare | Scor | Teste corecte | Timp de răspuns (mediu) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #81 | Qwen3 Coder Next none | Qwen | 7.3 | 5.1 | 0/1 | 3.14s |
| #82 | Nemotron 3 Super none | NVIDIA | 3.3 | 5.1 | 0/1 | 2.99s |
| #63 | GPT-5.4 none | OpenAI | 10.0 | 5.9 | 1/1 | 2.95s |
| #88 | MiMo-V2-Flash none | Xiaomi | 6.3 | 4.5 | 0/1 | 2.79s |
| #60 | Qwen3.5-35B-A3B none | Qwen | 10.0 | 6.1 | 1/1 | 2.67s |
| #83 | GPT-4o-mini none | OpenAI | 3.0 | 4.9 | 0/1 | 2.55s |
| #64 | Qwen3.5-27B none | Qwen | 10.0 | 5.9 | 1/1 | 2.51s |
| #20 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview low | 10.0 | 8.1 | 1/1 | 2.20s | |
| #89 | Grok 4.1 Fast none | X AI | 5.3 | 4.5 | 0/1 | 1.79s |
| #52 | MiMo-V2-Omni none | Xiaomi | 6.6 | 6.5 | 0/1 | 1.72s |
| #86 | Qwen3 Coder Next medium | Qwen | 4.7 | 4.7 | 0/1 | 1.69s |
| #19 | Gemini 3 Flash Preview none | 10.0 | 8.1 | 1/1 | 1.59s | |
| #51 | Mercury 2 medium | Inception | 10.0 | 6.5 | 1/1 | 1.53s |
| #27 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview none | 10.0 | 7.9 | 1/1 | 1.47s | |
| #90 | GPT-5.4 Nano none | OpenAI | 7.1 | 4.5 | 0/1 | 1.43s |