- Rang
- #78
- Totaal aantal uitvoer-tokens
- 495,541
- Responstijd (gem.)
- 118.97s
- Totale kosten
- $2.672
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B (low) vs GLM 5.2 (high)
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B (low) leidt in gemiddelde score met 8.1 vs 8.0. GLM 5.2 (high) heeft lagere benchmarkkosten met $0.799 vs $2.672. GLM 5.2 (high) is sneller met 69.86s vs 118.97s, met slagingspercentages van 72.7% vs 69.7%.
Vergeleken modellen
- Rang
- #86
- Totaal aantal uitvoer-tokens
- 364,655
- Responstijd (gem.)
- 69.86s
- Totale kosten
- $0.799
Aanbevolen model
GLM 5.2 (high)
De score blijft dicht bij de beste score hier (8.0 vs 8.1) en het kost ongeveer 3.3x minder dan Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B (low).
Gedetailleerde vergelijking
| Metriek | Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B low | GLM 5.2 GLM 5.2 high |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 8.1 | 8.0 |
| Rang | #78 | #86 |
| Betrouwbaarheid | 9.4 | 10.0 |
| Consistentie | 9.2 | 8.6 |
| Pogingen | 66/66 | 66/66 |
| Correcte tests | ||
| Slaagpercentage per poging | 72.7% | 69.7% |
| Instabiele tests | 2 | 3 |
| Totaal runs | 66 | 66 |
| Kosten per resultaat | 17.812 | 6.849 |
| Totale kosten | $2.672 | $0.799 |
| Invoerprijs | $2.000 / 1M | $0.650 / 1M |
| Uitvoerprijs | $6.000 / 1M | $2.042 / 1M |
| Totaal aantal invoer-tokens | 113,279 | 83,822 |
| Uitvoer-tokens | 121,045 | 72,040 |
| Redeneer-tokens | 374,496 | 292,615 |
| Responstijd (gem.) | 118.97s | 69.86s |
| Responstijd (max) | 534.21s | 599.43s |
| Responstijd (totaal) | 2617.41s | 1536.98s |
| Parameters | 2.4T totaal (95B actief) | 744B totaal (40B actief) |
| Beschikbaarheid | Gewichten beschikbaar | Open-source |
Model generatie-showcase
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#78 Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B
low- Kosten
- $0.100
- Tijd
- 193.2s
- Tokens
- 16,767 tok
#86 GLM 5.2
high
Reached the allocated time limit (300 seconds) without receiving showcase output.
- Kosten
- $0.000
- Tijd
- 300.0s
- Tokens
- 0 tok
Topmodellen op score
Score vs totale kosten
Responstijd (gem.)
Score vs Responstijd (gem.)
Totaal aantal uitvoer-tokens
Score vs Totaal aantal uitvoer-tokens
Categorie-uitsplitsing
| Anti-AI-trucs | Score | Consistentie | Slaagpercentage per poging | Instabiele tests | Correcte tests | Responstijd (gem.) | Invoer-tokens | Uitvoer-tokens | Redeneer-tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 22.04s | 1,104 | 397 | 4,814 | |
| GLM 5.2 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 5.80s | 639 | 406 | 2,660 |
| Programmeren | Score | Consistentie | Slaagpercentage per poging | Instabiele tests | Correcte tests | Responstijd (gem.) | Invoer-tokens | Uitvoer-tokens | Redeneer-tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B | 7.8 | 9.3 | 66.7% | 0 | 172.53s | 6,716 | 21,405 | 57,399 | |
| GLM 5.2 | 6.4 | 8.6 | 33.3% | 0 | 73.03s | 5,124 | 2,302 | 22,546 |
| Gecombineerd | Score | Consistentie | Slaagpercentage per poging | Instabiele tests | Correcte tests | Responstijd (gem.) | Invoer-tokens | Uitvoer-tokens | Redeneer-tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B | 8.2 | 6.9 | 66.7% | 1 | 231.85s | 85,267 | 8,008 | 50,681 | |
| GLM 5.2 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 321.47s | 61,516 | 18,824 | 63,861 |
| Gegevensparsering en extractie | Score | Consistentie | Slaagpercentage per poging | Instabiele tests | Correcte tests | Responstijd (gem.) | Invoer-tokens | Uitvoer-tokens | Redeneer-tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 22.27s | 7,956 | 839 | 2,445 | |
| GLM 5.2 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 5.81s | 7,143 | 435 | 1,414 |
| Domeinspecifiek | Score | Consistentie | Slaagpercentage per poging | Instabiele tests | Correcte tests | Responstijd (gem.) | Invoer-tokens | Uitvoer-tokens | Redeneer-tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B | 3.2 | 9.3 | 0.0% | 0 | 287.65s | 1,008 | 16,133 | 156,114 | |
| GLM 5.2 | 3.1 | 6.5 | 11.1% | 1 | 126.85s | 560 | 49,045 | 157,522 |
| Algemene intelligentie | Score | Consistentie | Slaagpercentage per poging | Instabiele tests | Correcte tests | Responstijd (gem.) | Invoer-tokens | Uitvoer-tokens | Redeneer-tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B | 6.1 | 3.1 | 66.7% | 1 | 22.97s | 606 | 44 | 1,497 | |
| GLM 5.2 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 12.90s | 498 | 63 | 1,743 |
| Instructies opvolgen | Score | Consistentie | Slaagpercentage per poging | Instabiele tests | Correcte tests | Responstijd (gem.) | Invoer-tokens | Uitvoer-tokens | Redeneer-tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B | 9.8 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 19.54s | 903 | 263 | 1,480 | |
| GLM 5.2 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 4.26s | 678 | 151 | 1,210 |
| Puzzeloplossing | Score | Consistentie | Slaagpercentage per poging | Instabiele tests | Correcte tests | Responstijd (gem.) | Invoer-tokens | Uitvoer-tokens | Redeneer-tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 43.37s | 1,026 | 1,154 | 25,563 | |
| GLM 5.2 | 6.0 | 4.6 | 66.7% | 2 | 33.71s | 665 | 568 | 22,392 |
| Toolaanroepen | Score | Consistentie | Slaagpercentage per poging | Instabiele tests | Correcte tests | Responstijd (gem.) | Invoer-tokens | Uitvoer-tokens | Redeneer-tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 25.88s | 8,481 | 302 | 975 | |
| GLM 5.2 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 9.25s | 6,861 | 246 | 503 |
| Algemene kennis | Score | Consistentie | Slaagpercentage per poging | Instabiele tests | Correcte tests | Responstijd (gem.) | Invoer-tokens | Uitvoer-tokens | Redeneer-tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 422.46s | 212 | 72,500 | 73,528 | |
| GLM 5.2 | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 127.82s | 138 | 0 | 18,764 |
Snelle vergelijking
Vergelijkingspaar wisselen
GPT-5 MinimediumvsQwen3.8 2.4T A95BlowMuse Glimmer 30BxhighvsQwen3.8 2.4T A95BlowDeepSeek V4 Flash 0731lowvsGLM 5.2highInklingmediumvsGLM 5.2highQwen3.8 2.4T A95BlowvsGrok 4.7mediumQwen3.8 2.4T A95BlowvsInklinghighMuse Spark 1.1highvsQwen3.8 2.4T A95BlowGrok 4.7mediumvsGLM 5.2highGrok 4.7lowvsGLM 5.2highKimi K3maxvsGLM 5.2highDeepSeek V4 Flash 0731highvsQwen3.8 2.4T A95BlowGPT-5.2 ChatnonevsGLM 5.2high