Gegevensparsering en extractie-ranglijst
Zie welke AI-modellen het best presteren op Gegevensparsering en extractie, welke betrouwbaar blijven en waar de grootste verschillen zitten.
Getoonde modellen
15
Gemiddelde Gegevensparsering en extractie-score
0.9
Beste model
Ling 3.1 Flash 1.0
451/451
Modellen filteren
Geen modellen komen overeen met de huidige zoekopdracht en filters.
| Rang | Model | Bedrijf | Gegevensparsering en extractie-score | Score | Totale kosten | Correcte tests | Responstijd (gem.) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #425 | Laguna Xs.2 default | Poolside | 1.0 | 0.3 | $0.004 | 2/2 | 646ms |
| #432 | Jev 1.13 default | Typesafe | 1.0 | 0.3 | $0.003 | 2/2 | 799ms |
| #436 | GPT-6 Luna Decisions default | OpenAI | 1.0 | 0.2 | $0.005 | 2/2 | 411ms |
| #446 | Solar Decide Flash default | Upstage | 1.0 | 0.2 | $0.003 | 2/2 | 1.33s |
| #326 | Hy4 preview low | Tencent | 0.9 | 0.5 | $1.844 | 1/2 | 88.5s |
| #363 | Hy4 preview none | Tencent | 0.9 | 0.5 | $0.165 | 1/2 | 22.8s |
| #299 | Ling 3.0 Flash high | Inclusionai | 0.7 | 0.6 | $0.021 | 1/2 | 7.15s |
| #136 | Muse Glimmer 30B high | Meta | 0.7 | 0.8 | $0.506 | 1/2 | 14.9s |
| #141 | Muse Glimmer 30B medium | Meta | 0.7 | 0.8 | $0.288 | 1/2 | 7.20s |
| #188 | Ember-1 low | Fireworks | 0.7 | 0.7 | $1.488 | 1/2 | 34.8s |
| #196 | Ember-1 high | Fireworks | 0.7 | 0.7 | $2.405 | 1/2 | 36.1s |
| #202 | Qwen3.5-Flash medium | Qwen | 0.7 | 0.7 | $0.184 | 1/2 | 57.0s |
| #223 | Mercury 2 medium | Inception | 0.7 | 0.7 | $0.121 | 1/2 | 1.11s |
| #252 | Qwen3.5-35B-A3B medium | Qwen | 0.7 | 0.6 | $0.716 | 1/2 | 59.3s |
| #268 | KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 medium | Kwaipilot | 0.7 | 0.6 | $0.669 | 1/2 | 4.70s |