Gegevensparsering en extractie-ranglijst
Zie welke AI-modellen het best presteren op Gegevensparsering en extractie, welke betrouwbaar blijven en waar de grootste verschillen zitten. Sorteren op: Correcte tests ↓.
Getoonde modellen
15
Gemiddelde Gegevensparsering en extractie-score
0.9
Beste model
Gemini 3.6 Flash 1.0
451/451
Modellen filteren
Geen modellen komen overeen met de huidige zoekopdracht en filters.
| Rang | Model | Bedrijf | Gegevensparsering en extractie-score | Score | Totale kosten | Correcte tests | Responstijd (gem.) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #61 | GPT-5.4 medium | OpenAI | 1.0 | 0.9 | $2.213 | 2/2 | 5.32s |
| #62 | Muse Spark Open medium | Meta | 1.0 | 0.9 | $1.260 | 2/2 | 10.7s |
| #65 | Muse Spark 1.2 low | Meta | 1.0 | 0.9 | $0.881 | 2/2 | 4.22s |
| #66 | GPT-5.2 medium | OpenAI | 1.0 | 0.9 | $1.558 | 2/2 | 3.15s |
| #67 | Qwen3.8 27B high | Qwen | 1.0 | 0.9 | ~$0.298 | 2/2 | 34.9s |
| #68 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro medium | Xiaomi | 1.0 | 0.9 | $0.586 | 2/2 | 2.71s |
| #69 | Seed 2.1 Turbo medium | Bytedance Seed | 1.0 | 0.9 | $2.042 | 2/2 | 37.8s |
| #70 | GPT-6 Sol low | OpenAI | 1.0 | 0.9 | $0.477 | 2/2 | 13.6s |
| #72 | Muse Spark 1.1 low | Meta | 1.0 | 0.9 | $0.885 | 2/2 | 3.22s |
| #73 | Claude Sonnet 5.5 xhigh | Anthropic | 1.0 | 0.9 | $1.516 | 2/2 | 4.96s |
| #75 | Claude Haiku 5.5 low | Anthropic | 1.0 | 0.9 | $0.061 | 2/2 | 3.45s |
| #76 | Qwen3.8 Max (0902) low | Qwen | 1.0 | 0.9 | $1.131 | 2/2 | 9.94s |
| #77 | Grok 4.6 high | X AI | 1.0 | 0.9 | $2.629 | 2/2 | 16.1s |
| #78 | Muse Spark 1.3 low | Meta | 1.0 | 0.9 | $0.911 | 2/2 | 3.62s |
| #79 | Claude Sonnet 5 medium | Anthropic | 1.0 | 0.9 | $1.438 | 2/2 | 3.16s |