Gegevensparsering en extractie-ranglijst
Zie welke AI-modellen het best presteren op Gegevensparsering en extractie, welke betrouwbaar blijven en waar de grootste verschillen zitten. Sorteren op: Correcte tests ↓.
Getoonde modellen
15
Gemiddelde Gegevensparsering en extractie-score
0.9
Beste model
Gemini 3.6 Flash 1.0
451/451
Modellen filteren
Geen modellen komen overeen met de huidige zoekopdracht en filters.
| Rang | Model | Bedrijf | Gegevensparsering en extractie-score | Score | Totale kosten | Correcte tests | Responstijd (gem.) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #289 | gpt-oss-120b medium | OpenAI | 0.6 | 0.6 | $0.030 | 1/2 | 1.98s |
| #298 | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash none | DeepSeek | 0.7 | 0.6 | $0.391 | 1/2 | 3.09s |
| #299 | Ling 3.0 Flash high | Inclusionai | 0.7 | 0.6 | $0.021 | 1/2 | 7.15s |
| #300 | Ring 2.6 1t medium | Inclusionai | 0.6 | 0.6 | $0.102 | 1/2 | 37.4s |
| #301 | Trinity Large Thinking high | Arcee AI | 0.6 | 0.6 | $0.794 | 1/2 | 14.0s |
| #305 | Seed 2.1 Turbo none | Bytedance Seed | 0.7 | 0.6 | $0.182 | 1/2 | 2.63s |
| #319 | GPT-6 Luna none | OpenAI | 0.7 | 0.5 | $0.026 | 1/2 | 9.34s |
| #324 | Qwen3.8 27B none | Qwen | 0.6 | 0.5 | ~$0.010 | 1/2 | 1.14s |
| #326 | Hy4 preview low | Tencent | 0.9 | 0.5 | $1.844 | 1/2 | 88.5s |
| #329 | Ember-1 none | Fireworks | 0.6 | 0.5 | $0.786 | 1/2 | 35.3s |
| #330 | Hy3 preview medium | Tencent | 0.7 | 0.5 | $0.049 | 1/2 | 5.25s |
| #332 | Granite 4.2 8B low | IBM Granite | 0.7 | 0.5 | $0.036 | 1/2 | 1.39s |
| #333 | Kimi K2.5 none | Moonshot AI | 0.7 | 0.5 | $0.262 | 1/2 | 42.1s |
| #339 | Nemotron 3.5 Lightning high | NVIDIA | 0.7 | 0.5 | $0.168 | 1/2 | 14.0s |
| #340 | KAT Coder AIR V2.5 high | Kwaipilot | 0.6 | 0.5 | $0.077 | 1/2 | 3.59s |