Gegevensparsering en extractie-ranglijst
Zie welke AI-modellen het best presteren op Gegevensparsering en extractie, welke betrouwbaar blijven en waar de grootste verschillen zitten. Sorteren op: Responstijd (gem.) ↑.
Getoonde modellen
15
Gemiddelde Gegevensparsering en extractie-score
0.9
Beste model
MiMo-V2-Flash 0.7
451/451
Modellen filteren
Geen modellen komen overeen met de huidige zoekopdracht en filters.
| Rang | Model | Bedrijf | Gegevensparsering en extractie-score | Score | Totale kosten | Correcte tests | Responstijd (gem.) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #131 | Qwen3.7 Plus none | Qwen | 1.0 | 0.8 | $0.178 | 2/2 | 1.43s |
| #280 | Granite 4.2 8B medium | IBM Granite | 0.7 | 0.6 | $0.029 | 1/2 | 1.43s |
| #257 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite low | 1.0 | 0.6 | $0.717 | 2/2 | 1.44s | |
| #336 | Qwen3.6 35B A3B none | Qwen | 1.0 | 0.5 | $0.105 | 2/2 | 1.46s |
| #394 | GLM 4.7 Flash medium | Z.ai | 0.6 | 0.4 | $0.193 | 1/2 | 1.51s |
| #182 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash low | Xiaomi | 1.0 | 0.7 | $0.200 | 2/2 | 1.51s |
| #216 | GPT-5.6 Sol none | OpenAI | 1.0 | 0.7 | $0.795 | 2/2 | 1.53s |
| #210 | Qwen3.5-Flash none | Qwen | 1.0 | 0.7 | $0.089 | 2/2 | 1.57s |
| #284 | GLM 5.3 FlashX low | Z.ai | 1.0 | 0.6 | $0.157 | 2/2 | 1.59s |
| #295 | Qwen3.8 Flash Next none | Qwen | 1.0 | 0.6 | ~$0.011 | 2/2 | 1.60s |
| #232 | Beam 1.0 501B A23B xhigh | Reflection | 1.0 | 0.6 | $0.688 | 2/2 | 1.60s |
| #247 | Gemini 3.5 Flash minimal | 1.0 | 0.6 | $0.508 | 2/2 | 1.66s | |
| #274 | Beam 1.0 501B A23B high | Reflection | 1.0 | 0.6 | $0.674 | 2/2 | 1.66s |
| #52 | Gemini 3.6 Flash low | 1.0 | 0.9 | $0.363 | 2/2 | 1.66s | |
| #320 | Gemma 4 26B A4B none | 1.0 | 0.5 | $0.031 | 2/2 | 1.70s |