AI BENCHY Categorie
Gegevensparsering en extractie-ranglijst
Zie welke AI-modellen het best presteren op Gegevensparsering en extractie, welke betrouwbaar blijven en waar de grootste verschillen zitten. Sorteren op: Correcte tests ↑.
| Rang | Model | Bedrijf | Gegevensparsering en extractie-score | Score | Correcte tests | Responstijd (gem.) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #22 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview low | 10.0 | 8.1 | 2/2 | 3.00s | |
| #24 | Gemma 4 26B A4B medium | 10.0 | 8.0 | 2/2 | 16.5s | |
| #25 | Grok 4.20 Beta medium | X AI | 10.0 | 8.0 | 2/2 | 4.01s |
| #26 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 medium | Anthropic | 10.0 | 8.0 | 2/2 | 13.9s |
| #27 | DeepSeek V3.2 medium | DeepSeek | 10.0 | 8.0 | 2/2 | 36.1s |
| #28 | GPT-5.2 Chat none | OpenAI | 10.0 | 7.9 | 2/2 | 3.05s |
| #29 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview none | 10.0 | 7.9 | 2/2 | 1.22s | |
| #30 | Step 3.5 Flash medium | Stepfun | 10.0 | 7.9 | 2/2 | 15.0s |
| #31 | GLM 5V Turbo medium | Z.ai | 10.0 | 7.8 | 2/2 | 9.60s |
| #33 | GLM 5.1 medium | Z.ai | 10.0 | 7.8 | 2/2 | 9.33s |
| #34 | Kimi K2.6 medium | Moonshot AI | 10.0 | 7.7 | 2/2 | 20.4s |
| #35 | MiMo-V2-Omni medium | Xiaomi | 10.0 | 7.7 | 2/2 | 2.29s |
| #36 | GPT-5.3 Chat none | OpenAI | 10.0 | 7.7 | 2/2 | 2.21s |
| #37 | Claude Opus 4.6 medium | Anthropic | 10.0 | 7.6 | 2/2 | 7.37s |
| #38 | GPT-5.4 Nano medium | OpenAI | 10.0 | 7.6 | 2/2 | 2.54s |