#102 GLM 4.7 Flash
medium
Invalid SVG
- Cost
- $0.000
- Time
- 186.2s
- Tokens
- 12,112 tok
Z.ai
Release: 2026-01-19
Tested on: 2026-04-11 01:19
z-ai/glm-4.7-flash::medium
30B total (3B active)MoEOpen source
(medium)
(none)
Summary
GLM 4.7 Flash scores 4.6 on AI BENCHY and ranks #102. It has N/A reliability, a 38.9% pass rate, $0.046 total cost, and 32.33s average response time.
What makes GLM 4.7 Flash unique: Its total benchmark cost is unusually low for its score range.
Model facts
Researched on 2026-08-12
- Parameters
- 30B total (3B active)
- Architecture
- MoE
- Availability
- Open source
- License
- MIT
4.6
Consistency
6.3
N/A
$0.046
Total Output Tokens
112,089
Total Input Tokens
0
Input Price
$0.060 / 1M
Output Price
$0.400 / 1M
Flaky tests
8
Flaky tests had mixed outcomes across runs (at least one pass and one fail).
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
Run history
| Tested on | Score | Reliability | Tests Correct | Total Cost | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-14 01:33 Re-test | 4.3 | 8.6 | $0.168 | Compare | |
| 2026-07-16 22:32 New test added | 4.3 | 7.8 | $0.166 | Compare | |
| 2026-06-04 13:29 New test added | 4.4 | 6.7 | $0.054 | Compare | |
| 2026-05-21 23:50 Suite changed | 4.5 | 8.3 | $0.054 | Compare | |
| 2026-04-11 01:19 First recorded run | 4.6 | N/A | $0.046 | Current run |
Run comparison
| Run | Benchmark coverage | Score | Consistency | Reliability | Tests Correct | Flaky tests | Total Output Tokens | Total Input Tokens | Total Cost | Response Time (avg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-04-11 01:19 · First recorded run | 54/54 attempts | 4.6 | 6.3 | N/A | 4/18 | 8 | 112,089 | 0 | $0.046 | 32.33s |
| 2026-06-04 13:29 · New test added | 63/63 attempts | 4.4 | 6.8 | 6.7 | 4/21 | 8 | 132,833 | 37,206 | $0.054 | 35.10s |
| Difference | — | +0.2 | -0.5 | 0 | 0 | -20744 | -37206 | -$0.009 | -2764ms |
Benchmark coverage differs: 54/54 attempts (Target: 3 repeats per test) versus 63/63 attempts (Target: 3 repeats per test). Totals and repeat-sensitive metrics are not directly comparable.
These two runs used different benchmark suites, so the deltas reflect both model changes and suite changes.
Charts
Choose the first model, then click a second model to open a side-by-side page.
Top Models by Score
Score vs Total Cost
Response Time (avg)
Score vs Response Time (avg)
Total Output Tokens
Score vs Total Output Tokens
Quick Compare
GLM 4.7 FlashmediumvsLaguna S 2.1noneFree AvailableGLM 4.7 FlashmediumvsGrok 4.20noneGLM 4.7 FlashmediumvsMiniMax M2.5mediumGLM 4.7 FlashmediumvsLing 3.0 TinynoneGLM 4.7 FlashmediumvsQwen3 Coder NextmediumGLM 4.7 FlashmediumvsGranite 4.1 8BnoneGLM 4.7 FlashmediumvsMercury 2noneGLM 4.7 FlashmediumvsNemotron 3.5 LightningnoneFree AvailableGLM 4.7 FlashmediumvsCobuddymediumGLM 4.7 FlashmediumvsLing 3.0 Tinyhigh
Category Breakdown
| Category | Score | Consistency | Tests Correct |
|---|---|---|---|
| Anti-AI Tricks | 4.7 | 5.9 | |
| Coding | 3.6 | 2.1 | |
| Combined | 2.8 | 2.1 | |
| Data parsing and extraction | 6.3 | 10.0 | |
| Domain specific | 3.5 | 4.4 | |
| General Intelligence | 3.6 | 9.7 | |
| Instructions following | 6.2 | 5.8 | |
| Puzzle Solving | 2.9 | 7.2 | |
| Tool Calling | 10.0 | 10.0 |