#141 MiMo-V2.5
none- Cost
- $0.007
- Time
- 267.4s
- Tokens
- 25,283 tok
Xiaomi
Release: 2026-04-22
Tested on: 2026-06-04 13:48
xiaomi/mimo-v2.5::none
310B total (15B active)MoEOpen source
(medium)
(none)
Summary
MiMo-V2.5 scores 4.9 on AI BENCHY and ranks #141. It has 10.0 reliability, a 27.0% pass rate, $0.007 total cost, and 2.20s average response time.
What makes MiMo-V2.5 unique: Its total benchmark cost is unusually low for its score range. It is notably fast compared with similar models.
Model facts
Researched on 2026-08-12
- Parameters
- 310B total (15B active)
- Architecture
- MoE
- Availability
- Open source
- License
- MIT
4.9
Consistency
9.6
10.0
Total Output Tokens
2,267
Total Input Tokens
41,985
Input Price
$0.140 / 1M
Output Price
$0.280 / 1M
Flaky tests
1
Flaky tests had mixed outcomes across runs (at least one pass and one fail).
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
Run history
| Tested on | Score | Reliability | Tests Correct | Total Cost | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-14 02:25 Re-test | 5.1 | 10.0 | $0.025 ↓ | Compare | |
| 2026-07-16 22:42 New test added | 5.1 | 10.0 | $0.025 ↓ | Compare | |
| 2026-06-04 13:48 New test added | 4.9 | 10.0 | $0.007 ↓ | Current run | |
| 2026-05-22 12:51 New test added | 4.8 | 10.0 | $0.021 | Compare | |
| 2026-05-08 15:33 Suite changed | 4.9 | 10.0 | $0.019 | Compare | |
| 2026-04-22 21:39 First recorded run | 5.1 | N/A | $0.019 | Compare |
This run used a different benchmark suite. Keep suite changes in mind when reading historical movement.
Run comparison
| Run | Benchmark coverage | Score | Consistency | Reliability | Tests Correct | Flaky tests | Total Output Tokens | Total Input Tokens | Total Cost | Response Time (avg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-04 13:48 · New test added | 63/63 attempts | 4.9 | 9.6 | 10.0 | 5/21 | 1 | 2,267 | 41,985 | $0.007 | 2.20s |
| 2026-04-22 21:39 · First recorded run | 54/54 attempts | 5.1 | 10.0 | N/A | 5/18 | 0 | 2,177 | 0 | $0.019 | 1.05s |
| Difference | — | -0.2 | -0.4 | 0 | +1 | +90 | +41985 | -$0.012 | +1148ms |
Benchmark coverage differs: 63/63 attempts (Target: 3 repeats per test) versus 54/54 attempts (Target: 3 repeats per test). Totals and repeat-sensitive metrics are not directly comparable.
These two runs used different benchmark suites, so the deltas reflect both model changes and suite changes.
Price History
Historical pricing data for this model from OpenRouter.
| Date | Input Price | Output Price |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-04 14:42 | $0.140 / 1M | $0.280 / 1M |
Charts
Choose the first model, then click a second model to open a side-by-side page.
Top Models by Score
Score vs Total Cost
Response Time (avg)
Score vs Response Time (avg)
Total Output Tokens
Score vs Total Output Tokens
Quick Compare
MiMo-V2.5nonevsQwen3 Coder NextnoneMiMo-V2.5nonevsQwen3.5-9BnoneMiMo-V2.5nonevsGranite 4.2 8BlowMiMo-V2.5nonevsNorth Mini CodenoneFree AvailableMiMo-V2.5nonevsMistral Small 4mediumMiMo-V2.5nonevsMiniMax M2.7mediumMiMo-V2.5nonevsMistral Small 4noneMiMo-V2.5nonevsMercury 2.5 PreviewlowMiMo-V2.5nonevsNemotron 3.5 LightningmediumFree AvailableMiMo-V2.5nonevsLaguna S 2.1lowFree Available
Category Breakdown
| Category | Score | Consistency | Tests Correct |
|---|---|---|---|
| Anti-AI Tricks | 3.5 | 8.0 | |
| Coding | 5.5 | 10.0 | |
| Combined | 3.0 | 10.0 | |
| Data parsing and extraction | 6.5 | 10.0 | |
| Domain specific | 3.0 | 10.0 | |
| General Intelligence | 4.4 | 9.9 | |
| Instructions following | 6.5 | 10.0 | |
| Puzzle Solving | 5.4 | 10.0 | |
| Tool Calling | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Trivia | 3.0 | 10.0 |