#82 Qwen3.7 Plus
none- Cost
- $0.019
- Time
- 213.5s
- Tokens
- 11,960 tok
Qwen
Release: 2026-06-03
Tested on: 2026-06-03 21:24
qwen/qwen3.7-plus::none
~397B total (~17B active)MoEClosedEstimated
(medium)
(none)
Summary
Qwen3.7 Plus scores 6.6 on AI BENCHY and ranks #82. It has 10.0 reliability, a 50.0% pass rate, $0.027 total cost, and 2.95s average response time.
What makes Qwen3.7 Plus unique: Its total benchmark cost is unusually low for its score range. It is notably fast compared with similar models.
Model facts
Researched on 2026-08-12
- Parameters
- ~397B total (~17B active)
- Architecture
- MoE
- Availability
- Closed
- License
- -
Best estimate from public evidence; the vendor did not disclose every value. Estimate from the nearest released Plus-class architecture.
6.6
Consistency
10.0
10.0
$0.027
Total Output Tokens
6,572
Total Input Tokens
39,669
Input Price
$0.400 / 1M
Output Price
$1.600 / 1M
Cache Read Price
N/A
Cache Write Price
N/A
Cache prices apply to input tokens. Reads reuse cached prompts; writes store them and can cost extra. Output tokens use the output price.
Flaky tests
0
Flaky tests had mixed outcomes across runs (at least one pass and one fail).
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
Run history
| Tested on | Score | Reliability | Tests Correct | Total Cost | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-14 01:46 Re-test | 7.3 | 10.0 | $0.106 ↓ | Compare | |
| 2026-07-16 21:42 New test added | 7.2 | 10.0 | $0.106 ↓ | Compare | |
| 2026-06-04 13:23 New test added | 6.4 | 10.0 | $0.028 | Compare | |
| 2026-06-03 21:24 Initial run | 6.6 | 10.0 | $0.027 | Current run |
Run comparison
| Run | Benchmark coverage | Score | Consistency | Reliability | Tests Correct | Flaky tests | Total Output Tokens | Total Input Tokens | Total Cost | Response Time (avg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-03 21:24 · Initial run | 60/60 attempts | 6.6 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 10/20 | 0 | 6,572 | 39,669 | $0.027 | 2.95s |
| 2026-06-04 13:23 · New test added | 63/63 attempts | 6.4 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 10/21 | 0 | 6,578 | 42,510 | $0.028 | 2.85s |
| Difference | — | +0.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | -6 | -2841 | -$0.002 | +98ms |
Benchmark coverage differs: 60/60 attempts (Target: 3 repeats per test) versus 63/63 attempts (Target: 3 repeats per test). Totals and repeat-sensitive metrics are not directly comparable.
These two runs used different benchmark suites, so the deltas reflect both model changes and suite changes.
Price History
Historical pricing data for this model from OpenRouter.
| Date | Input Price | Output Price | Cache Read Price | Cache Write Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-03 21:35 | $0.400 / 1M | $1.600 / 1M | N/A | N/A |
Charts
Choose the first model, then click a second model to open a side-by-side page.
Top Models by Score
Score vs Total Cost
Response Time (avg)
Score vs Response Time (avg)
Total Output Tokens
Score vs Total Output Tokens
Quick Compare
Qwen3.7 PlusnonevsGrok 4.6mediumQwen3.7 PlusnonevsGrok 4.5lowQwen3.7 PlusnonevsStep 3.7 FlashmediumQwen3.7 PlusnonevsDeepSeek V4 Flash 0731mediumQwen3.7 PlusnonevsGLM 5.3highQwen3.7 PlusnonevsMuse WonderhighQwen3.7 PlusnonevsGrok 4.5mediumQwen3.7 PlusnonevsGPT-6 LunahighQwen3.7 PlusnonevsLing 3.1 FlashhighQwen3.7 PlusnonevsMuse Glimmer 30Bhigh
Category Breakdown
| Category | Score | Consistency | Tests Correct |
|---|---|---|---|
| Anti-AI Tricks | 6.5 | 10.0 | |
| Coding | 6.8 | 10.0 | |
| Combined | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Data parsing and extraction | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Domain specific | 3.0 | 10.0 | |
| General Intelligence | 5.3 | 10.0 | |
| Instructions following | 6.3 | 10.0 | |
| Puzzle Solving | 7.7 | 10.0 | |
| Tool Calling | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Trivia | 3.0 | 10.0 |