AI BENCHY
Advertise here
#67

Qwen3.7 Plus

Qwen Release: 2026-06-03 Tested on: 2026-07-16 21:42 qwen/qwen3.7-plus::none
~397B total (~17B active)MoEClosedEstimated
(medium) (none)

Summary

Qwen3.7 Plus scores 7.2 on AI BENCHY and ranks #67. It has 10.0 reliability, a 50.0% pass rate, $0.106 total cost, and 12.09s average response time.

What makes Qwen3.7 Plus unique: It stands out most in Combined, where it ranks #1, while Coding is its weakest area at #18.

Model facts

Researched on 2026-08-12

Estimated
Parameters
~397B total (~17B active)
Architecture
MoE
Availability
Closed
License
-

Best estimate from public evidence; the vendor did not disclose every value. Estimate from the nearest released Plus-class architecture.

Parameter source Availability source

Score

7.2

Consistency

10.0

Reliability

10.0

Total Cost (Current Price)

$0.106 ↓ -4.9%

Tested at: $0.112

Total Output Tokens

58,097

Total Input Tokens

98,824

Input Price

$0.320 / 1M

Output Price

$1.280 / 1M

Tests Correct

Wrong Tests: 11

Attempt pass rate: 50.0%

Flaky tests

0

Flaky tests had mixed outcomes across runs (at least one pass and one fail).

Response Time (avg)

12.09s

Response Time (max): 206.03s

Response Time (total): 265.89s

Wrong answer: 10 Did not follow instructions: 1

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#67 Qwen3.7 Plus

none
Cost
$0.019
Time
213.5s
Tokens
11,960 tok

Run history

Tested on Score Reliability Tests Correct Total Cost Compare
2026-08-14 01:46 Re-test 7.3 10.0 $0.106 ↓ Compare
2026-07-16 21:42 New test added 7.2 10.0 $0.106 ↓ Current run
2026-06-04 13:23 New test added 6.4 10.0 $0.028 Compare
2026-06-03 21:24 Initial run 6.6 10.0 $0.027 Compare

This run used a different benchmark suite. Keep suite changes in mind when reading historical movement.

Run comparison

RunBenchmark coverageScoreConsistencyReliabilityTests CorrectFlaky testsTotal Output TokensTotal Input TokensTotal CostResponse Time (avg)
2026-07-16 21:42 · New test added66/66 attempts7.210.010.011/22058,09798,824$0.10612.09s
2026-06-03 21:24 · Initial run60/60 attempts6.610.010.010/2006,57239,669$0.0272.95s
Difference—+0.60.00.0+10+51525+59155+$0.080+9138ms

Benchmark coverage differs: 66/66 attempts (Target: 3 repeats per test) versus 60/60 attempts (Target: 3 repeats per test). Totals and repeat-sensitive metrics are not directly comparable.

These two runs used different benchmark suites, so the deltas reflect both model changes and suite changes.

Price History

Historical pricing data for this model from OpenRouter.

Date Input Price Output Price
2026-06-04 15:40 $0.400 / 1M $1.600 / 1M
2026-06-12 18:42 $0.320 / 1M $1.280 / 1M

Charts

Choose the first model, then click a second model to open a side-by-side page.

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Quick Compare

Qwen3.7 PlusnonevsGemini 3.1 Flash LitemediumQwen3.7 PlusnonevsDeepSeek V4 Flash 0731mediumQwen3.7 PlusnonevsGLM 5.3 FlashhighQwen3.7 PlusnonevsClaude Opus 4.8noneQwen3.7 PlusnonevsKAT-Coder-Pro V2.5lowQwen3.7 PlusnonevsKimi K2.6mediumQwen3.7 PlusnonevsGLM 5.3highQwen3.7 PlusnonevsKAT-Coder-Pro V2.5highQwen3.7 PlusnonevsClaude Sonnet 4.6noneQwen3.7 PlusnonevsMuse Glimmer 30Bhigh

Category Breakdown

Category Score Consistency Tests Correct
Anti-AI Tricks 6.5 10.0
Coding 5.5 10.0
Combined 10.0 10.0
Data parsing and extraction 10.0 10.0
Domain specific 3.0 10.0
General Intelligence 5.3 10.0
Instructions following 6.3 10.0
Puzzle Solving 7.7 10.0
Tool Calling 10.0 10.0
Trivia 3.0 10.0

Compared models