#261 MiniMax M2.5
medium
Invalid SVG
- Cost
- $0.000
- Time
- 300.0s
- Tokens
- 0 tok
Minimax
Release: 2026-02-12
Tested on: 2026-08-14 01:38
minimax/minimax-m2.5::medium
230B total (10B active)MoEWeights available Summary
MiniMax M2.5 scores 4.6 on AI BENCHY and ranks #261. It has 10.0 reliability, a 43.9% pass rate, $0.272 total cost, and 69.08s average response time.
What makes MiniMax M2.5 unique: It stands out most in Combined, where it ranks #1, while Data parsing and extraction is its weakest area at #9.
Model facts
Researched on 2026-08-12
- Parameters
- 230B total (10B active)
- Architecture
- MoE
- Availability
- Weights available
- License
- MiniMax modified MIT
4.6
Consistency
6.6
10.0
Total Output Tokens
272,229
Total Input Tokens
142,621
Input Price
$0.220 / 1M
Output Price
$0.900 / 1M
Flaky tests
9
Flaky tests had mixed outcomes across runs (at least one pass and one fail).
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
Run history
| Tested on | Score | Reliability | Tests Correct | Total Cost | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-14 01:38 Re-test | 4.6 | 10.0 | $0.272 ↓ | Current run | |
| 2026-07-16 21:18 New test added | 4.6 | 10.0 | $0.340 ↓ | Compare | |
| 2026-06-04 13:23 New test added | 5.3 | 8.9 | $0.385 ↓ | Compare | |
| 2026-05-21 23:48 Suite changed | 5.4 | 8.3 | $0.305 | Compare | |
| 2026-04-20 17:48 First recorded run | 5.7 | N/A | $0.250 | Compare |
This run used a different benchmark suite. Keep suite changes in mind when reading historical movement.
Run comparison
| Run | Benchmark coverage | Score | Consistency | Reliability | Tests Correct | Flaky tests | Total Output Tokens | Total Input Tokens | Total Cost | Response Time (avg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-14 01:38 · Current run | 66/66 attempts | 4.6 | 6.6 | 10.0 | 5/22 | 9 | 272,229 | 142,621 | $0.272 | 69.08s |
| 2026-07-16 21:18 · New test added | 66/66 attempts | 4.6 | 6.2 | 10.0 | 5/22 | 10 | 465,377 | 142,561 | $0.340 | 68.27s |
| Difference | — | 0.0 | +0.4 | 0.0 | 0 | -1 | -193148 | +60 | -$0.069 | +815ms |
These two runs used different benchmark suites, so the deltas reflect both model changes and suite changes.
Price History
Historical pricing data for this model from OpenRouter.
| Date | Input Price | Output Price |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-04 15:40 | $0.150 / 1M | $1.150 / 1M |
| 2026-06-10 13:42 | $0.150 / 1M | $0.900 / 1M |
| 2026-06-29 01:00 | $0.120 / 1M | $0.480 / 1M |
| 2026-08-14 12:51 | $0.220 / 1M | $0.900 / 1M |
Charts
Choose the first model, then click a second model to open a side-by-side page.
Top Models by Score
Score vs Total Cost
Response Time (avg)
Score vs Response Time (avg)
Total Output Tokens
Score vs Total Output Tokens
Quick Compare
MiniMax M2.5mediumvsQwen3 Coder NextmediumMiniMax M2.5mediumvsLaguna S 2.1noneFree AvailableMiniMax M2.5mediumvsMercury 2noneMiniMax M2.5mediumvsGLM 4.7 FlashmediumMiniMax M2.5mediumvsCobuddymediumMiniMax M2.5mediumvsGrok 4.20noneMiniMax M2.5mediumvsTrinity Large PreviewnoneMiniMax M2.5mediumvsLing 3.0 TinynoneMiniMax M2.5mediumvsGLM 4.7 FlashnoneMiniMax M2.5mediumvsGranite 4.1 8Bnone
Category Breakdown
| Category | Score | Consistency | Tests Correct |
|---|---|---|---|
| Anti-AI Tricks | 7.9 | 6.3 | |
| Coding | 3.4 | 9.1 | |
| Combined | 3.7 | 1.8 | |
| Data parsing and extraction | 4.6 | 1.7 | |
| Domain specific | 2.9 | 7.2 | |
| General Intelligence | 3.8 | 2.5 | |
| Instructions following | 7.5 | 10.0 | |
| Puzzle Solving | 5.3 | 7.2 | |
| Tool Calling | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Trivia | 3.0 | 10.0 |