AI BENCHY
Advertise here
#168

KAT-Coder-Air V2.5

Kwaipilot Release: 2026-07-14 Tested on: 2026-07-14 11:05 kwaipilot/kat-coder-air-v2.5::none
~35B total (~3B active)MoEClosedEstimated

Summary

KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 scores 4.9 on AI BENCHY and ranks #168. It has 10.0 reliability, a 38.1% pass rate, $0.037 total cost, and 6.99s average response time.

Model facts

Researched on 2026-08-12

Estimated
Parameters
~35B total (~3B active)
Architecture
MoE
Availability
Closed
License
-

Best estimate from public evidence; the vendor did not disclose every value. Weights were announced but were not available for the exact checkpoint at research time.

Score

4.9

Consistency

7.1

Total Output Tokens

49,933

Total Input Tokens

41,328

Input Price

$0.150 / 1M

Output Price

$0.600 / 1M

Tests Correct

Wrong Tests: 16

Attempt pass rate: 38.1%

Flaky tests

7

Flaky tests had mixed outcomes across runs (at least one pass and one fail).

Response Time (avg)

6.99s

Response Time (max): 24.94s

Response Time (total): 146.78s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#168 KAT-Coder-Air V2.5

none
Cost
$0.002
Time
14.5s
Tokens
2,619 tok

Run history

Tested on Score Reliability Tests Correct Total Cost Compare
2026-08-14 03:15 Re-test 4.8 10.0 $0.070 Compare
2026-07-16 23:28 New test added 4.8 10.0 $0.067 Compare
2026-07-14 11:05 Initial run 4.9 10.0 $0.037 Current run

Price History

Historical pricing data for this model from OpenRouter.

Date Input Price Output Price
2026-07-14 11:25 $0.150 / 1M $0.600 / 1M

Charts

Choose the first model, then click a second model to open a side-by-side page.

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Quick Compare

Category Breakdown

Category Score Consistency Tests Correct
Anti-AI Tricks 5.3 5.6
Coding 3.3 9.6
Combined 4.7 1.6
Data parsing and extraction 6.3 5.8
Domain specific 2.9 7.2
General Intelligence 5.0 10.0
Instructions following 9.9 10.0
Puzzle Solving 2.9 4.4
Tool Calling 10.0 10.0
Trivia 3.0 10.0

Compared models