#320 Ling 3.0 Tiny
low
No output was saved. The original provider response or failure reason is unavailable.
- Cost
- $0.000
- Time
- 200.0s
- Tokens
- 5,030 tok
Inclusionai
Release: 2026-08-07
Tested on: 2026-08-14 03:09
inclusionai/ling-3.0-tiny::low
7.9B total (1.3B active)MoEOpen source
Summary
Ling 3.0 Tiny scores 3.8 on AI BENCHY and ranks #320. It has 9.6 reliability, a 19.7% pass rate, $0.000 total cost, and 66.16s average response time.
What makes Ling 3.0 Tiny unique: It stands out most in General Intelligence, where it ranks #2, while Data parsing and extraction is its weakest area at #8. Its total benchmark cost is unusually low for its score range.
Model facts
Researched on 2026-08-12
- Parameters
- 7.9B total (1.3B active)
- Architecture
- MoE
- Availability
- Open source
- License
- MIT
3.8
Consistency
9.7
9.6
$0.000
Total Output Tokens
879,532
Total Input Tokens
99,662
Input Price
$0.000 / 1M
Output Price
$0.000 / 1M
Flaky tests
1
Flaky tests had mixed outcomes across runs (at least one pass and one fail).
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
Run history
| Tested on | Score | Reliability | Tests Correct | Total Cost | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-14 03:09 Re-test | 3.8 | 9.6 | $0.000 | Current run | |
| 2026-08-07 23:06 First recorded run | 3.8 | 9.7 | $0.000 | Compare |
This run used a different benchmark suite. Keep suite changes in mind when reading historical movement.
Run comparison
| Run | Benchmark coverage | Score | Consistency | Reliability | Tests Correct | Flaky tests | Total Output Tokens | Total Input Tokens | Total Cost | Response Time (avg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-14 03:09 · Current run | 66/66 attempts | 3.8 | 9.7 | 9.6 | 4/22 | 1 | 879,532 | 99,662 | $0.000 | 66.16s |
| 2026-08-07 23:06 · First recorded run | 66/66 attempts | 3.8 | 9.7 | 9.7 | 4/22 | 1 | 977,836 | 99,842 | $0.000 | 66.85s |
| Difference | — | 0.0 | 0.0 | -0.1 | 0 | 0 | -98304 | -180 | $0.000 | -691ms |
These two runs used different benchmark suites, so the deltas reflect both model changes and suite changes.
Price History
Historical pricing data for this model from OpenRouter.
| Date | Input Price | Output Price |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-14 12:51 | $0.000 / 1M | $0.000 / 1M |
Charts
Choose the first model, then click a second model to open a side-by-side page.
Top Models by Score
Score vs Total Cost
Response Time (avg)
Score vs Response Time (avg)
Total Output Tokens
Score vs Total Output Tokens
Quick Compare
Ling 3.0 TinylowvsLing 3.0 TinyhighLing 3.0 TinylowvsQwen3.5-9BmediumLing 3.0 TinylowvsMercury 2.5noneLing 3.0 TinylowvsLing 3.0 TinymediumLing 3.0 TinylowvsNemotron 3.5 LightningnoneFree AvailableLing 3.0 Tinylowvsgpt-oss-120bnoneFree AvailableLing 3.0 TinylowvsGranite 4.1 8BnoneLing 3.0 TinylowvsJev 1.13noneLing 3.0 TinylowvsLing 3.0 TinynoneLing 3.0 TinylowvsGrok 4.20none
Category Breakdown
| Category | Score | Consistency | Tests Correct |
|---|---|---|---|
| Anti-AI Tricks | 6.5 | 10.0 | |
| Coding | 2.9 | 10.0 | |
| Combined | 3.0 | 10.0 | |
| Data parsing and extraction | 2.8 | 10.0 | |
| Domain specific | 3.0 | 10.0 | |
| General Intelligence | 5.1 | 3.4 | |
| Instructions following | 6.6 | 10.0 | |
| Puzzle Solving | 3.0 | 10.0 | |
| Tool Calling | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Trivia | 3.0 | 10.0 |