Navigate
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Ling 3.0 Tiny (low) vs Ling 3.1 Flash

Ling 3.1 Flash leads on average score with 5.5 vs 3.7. Benchmark cost is effectively tied at $0.000 vs $0.000. Ling 3.1 Flash is faster at 15.75s vs 63.15s, with pass rates of 18.8% vs 33.3%.

Last updated at: 2026-10-26

Compared models

Rank
#418
Total Output Tokens
868,004
Response Time (avg)
63.15s
Total Cost
$0.000
Rank
#326
Total Output Tokens
85,777
Response Time (avg)
15.75s
Total Cost
$0.000
Recommended model Ling 3.1 Flash

It has the best score here (5.5), while responding about 4.0x faster than Ling 3.0 Tiny (low).

Detailed comparison

Metric Ling 3.0 Tiny Ling 3.0 Tiny low Release: 2026-08-07 Ling 3.1 Flash Ling 3.1 Flash none Release: 2026-10-03
Score 3.7 5.5
Rank #418 #326
Reliability 9.6 9.8
Consistency 9.7 8.4
Attempts 69/69 69/69
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 18.8% 33.3%
Flaky tests 1 5
Total Runs 69 69
Cost per result 0.000 0.000
Total Cost $0.000 $0.000
Input Price $0.000 / 1M $0.000 / 1M
Output Price $0.000 / 1M $0.000 / 1M
Cache Read Price N/A N/A
Cache Write Price N/A N/A
Total Input Tokens 99,662 286,758
Output Tokens 146,555 85,777
Reasoning Tokens 732,977 0
Response Time (avg) 63.15s 15.75s
Response Time (max) 252.08s 90.95s
Response Time (total) 1389.35s 362.23s
Parameters 7.9B total (1.3B active) 560B total (25B active)
Availability Open source Closed

Cache prices apply to input tokens. Reads reuse cached prompts; writes store them and can cost extra. Output tokens use the output price.

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#418 Ling 3.0 Tiny

low
No output was saved. The original provider response or failure reason is unavailable.
Cost
$0.000
Time
200.0s
Tokens
5,030 tok

#326 Ling 3.1 Flash

none
Cost
$0.000
Time
171.4s
Tokens
20,178 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Ling 3.0 Tiny 2.9 10.0 0.0% 0 170.73s 7,619 56,012 170,220
Ling 3.1 Flash 4.5 7.5 22.2% 1 31.85s 8,307 27,810 0

Switch Comparison Pair