Navigate
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Command A+ (high) vs Ling 3.0 Tiny (low)

Ling 3.0 Tiny (low) leads on average score with 3.7 vs 3.2. Ling 3.0 Tiny (low) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.000 vs $0.079. Ling 3.0 Tiny (low) is faster at 63.15s vs 89.96s, with pass rates of 0.0% vs 18.8%.

Last updated at: 2026-10-26

Compared models

Rank
#432
Total Output Tokens
28,663
Response Time (avg)
89.96s
Total Cost
$0.079
Rank
#418
Total Output Tokens
868,004
Response Time (avg)
63.15s
Total Cost
$0.000
Recommended model Ling 3.0 Tiny (low)

It has the strongest score in this comparison (3.7) and the best overall balance of cost and response time across 2 models.

Detailed comparison

Metric Command A+ Command A+ high Release: 2026-09-23 Ling 3.0 Tiny Ling 3.0 Tiny low Release: 2026-08-07
Score 3.2 3.7
Rank #432 #418
Reliability 3.5 9.6
Consistency 10.0 9.7
Attempts 69/69 69/69
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 0.0% 18.8%
Flaky tests 0 1
Total Runs 69 69
Cost per result 0.000 0.000
Total Cost $0.079 $0.000
Input Price $0.300 / 1M $0.000 / 1M
Output Price $1.500 / 1M $0.000 / 1M
Cache Read Price $0.150 / 1M N/A
Cache Write Price N/A N/A
Total Input Tokens 117,966 99,662
Output Tokens 5,149 146,555
Reasoning Tokens 23,514 732,977
Response Time (avg) 89.96s 63.15s
Response Time (max) 156.00s 252.08s
Response Time (total) 2069.01s 1389.35s
Parameters 218B total (25B active) 7.9B total (1.3B active)
Availability Open source Open source

Cache prices apply to input tokens. Reads reuse cached prompts; writes store them and can cost extra. Output tokens use the output price.

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#432 Command A+

high
Provider returned error
Cost
$0.000
Time
0.2s
Tokens
0 tok

#418 Ling 3.0 Tiny

low
No output was saved. The original provider response or failure reason is unavailable.
Cost
$0.000
Time
200.0s
Tokens
5,030 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Command A+ 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 92.74s 0 0 0
Ling 3.0 Tiny 2.9 10.0 0.0% 0 170.73s 7,619 56,012 170,220

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair

Ling 3.0 TinylowvsXing4.0 29b A4bmediumFree AvailableLing 3.0 TinylowvsNemotron 3.5 LightningnoneFree AvailableCommand A+highvsXing4.0 29b A4bnoneFree AvailableGranite 4.1 8bdefaultvsLing 3.0 TinylowCommand A+highvsGrok 4.20noneLing 3.0 TinylowvsGrok 4.20noneCommand A+mediumvsLing 3.0 TinylowLing 3.0 TinylowvsQwen3.5-9BmediumCommand A+highvsSpan-02defaultLing 3.0 TinylowvsXing4.0 29b A4bnoneFree AvailableMercury 2.5nonevsLing 3.0 TinylowCommand A+highvsLing 3.0 Tinymedium