#164 Gemma 4 31B
medium- Cost
- $0.002
- Time
- 45.7s
- Tokens
- 2,696 tok
Google
Release: 2026-04-02
Tested on: 2026-08-14 02:55
google/gemma-4-31b-it::medium
30.7BDenseOpen source
(medium)
(none)
Summary
Gemma 4 31B scores 6.2 on AI BENCHY and ranks #164. It has 10.0 reliability, a 65.2% pass rate, $0.101 total cost, and 78.59s average response time.
What makes Gemma 4 31B unique: It stands out most in General Intelligence, where it ranks #1, while Tool Calling is its weakest area at #15.
Model facts
Researched on 2026-08-12
- Parameters
- 30.7B
- Architecture
- Dense
- Availability
- Open source
- License
- Apache-2.0
6.2
Consistency
8.7
10.0
Total Output Tokens
267,421
Total Input Tokens
94,969
Input Price
$0.100 / 1M
Output Price
$0.340 / 1M
Flaky tests
3
Flaky tests had mixed outcomes across runs (at least one pass and one fail).
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
Run history
| Tested on | Score | Reliability | Tests Correct | Total Cost | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-14 02:55 Re-test | 6.2 | 10.0 | $0.101 ↓ | Current run | |
| 2026-07-16 23:24 New test added | 6.3 | 10.0 | $0.163 ↑ | Compare | |
| 2026-06-04 14:27 New test added | 7.9 | 8.9 | $0.035 ↓ | Compare | |
| 2026-05-22 00:35 Suite changed | 8.0 | 6.7 | $0.029 | Compare | |
| 2026-04-14 00:56 First recorded run | 8.3 | N/A | $0.018 | Compare |
This run used a different benchmark suite. Keep suite changes in mind when reading historical movement.
Run comparison
| Run | Benchmark coverage | Score | Consistency | Reliability | Tests Correct | Flaky tests | Total Output Tokens | Total Input Tokens | Total Cost | Response Time (avg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-14 02:55 · Current run | 66/66 attempts | 6.2 | 8.7 | 10.0 | 13/22 | 3 | 267,421 | 94,969 | $0.101 | 78.59s |
| 2026-07-16 23:24 · New test added | 66/66 attempts | 6.3 | 9.0 | 10.0 | 14/22 | 2 | 257,746 | 94,992 | $0.163 | 75.38s |
| Difference | — | -0.1 | -0.3 | 0.0 | -1 | +1 | +9675 | -23 | -$0.062 | +3216ms |
These two runs used different benchmark suites, so the deltas reflect both model changes and suite changes.
Price History
Historical pricing data for this model from OpenRouter.
| Date | Input Price | Output Price |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-04 15:40 | $0.120 / 1M | $0.370 / 1M |
| 2026-06-05 23:32 | $0.120 / 1M | $0.360 / 1M |
| 2026-06-12 18:42 | $0.120 / 1M | $0.350 / 1M |
| 2026-07-14 10:48 | $0.060 / 1M | $0.350 / 1M |
| 2026-07-16 15:36 | $0.220 / 1M | $0.550 / 1M |
| 2026-07-25 03:22 | $0.140 / 1M | $0.400 / 1M |
| 2026-08-14 12:51 | $0.100 / 1M | $0.340 / 1M |
Charts
Choose the first model, then click a second model to open a side-by-side page.
Top Models by Score
Score vs Total Cost
Response Time (avg)
Score vs Response Time (avg)
Total Output Tokens
Score vs Total Output Tokens
Quick Compare
Gemma 4 31BmediumFree AvailablevsSeed-2.0-LitenoneGemma 4 31BmediumFree AvailablevsGPT-5.6 LunalowGemma 4 31BmediumFree AvailablevsRing-2.6-1TmediumGemma 4 31BmediumFree AvailablevsClaude Sonnet 5noneGemma 4 31BmediumFree AvailablevsLing-3.0-flashhighGemma 4 31BmediumFree AvailablevsGemini 3.1 Flash LiteminimalGemma 4 31BmediumFree AvailablevsMiMo-V2.5mediumGemma 4 31BmediumFree AvailablevsQwen3.5-35B-A3BmediumGemma 4 31BmediumFree AvailablevsLongCat 2.0noneGemma 4 31BmediumFree Availablevsgpt-oss-120bmedium
Category Breakdown
| Category | Score | Consistency | Tests Correct |
|---|---|---|---|
| Anti-AI Tricks | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Coding | 4.3 | 5.8 | |
| Combined | 2.9 | 5.8 | |
| Data parsing and extraction | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Domain specific | 5.3 | 7.2 | |
| General Intelligence | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Instructions following | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Puzzle Solving | 9.9 | 10.0 | |
| Tool Calling | 3.0 | 10.0 | |
| Trivia | 3.0 | 10.0 |