AI BENCHY
Advertise here
#15

Gemma 4 31B

Google Release: 2026-04-02 Tested on: 2026-04-14 00:56 google/gemma-4-31b-it::medium
30.7BDenseOpen source
(medium) (none)

Summary

Gemma 4 31B scores 8.3 on AI BENCHY and ranks #15. It has N/A reliability, a 79.6% pass rate, $0.018 total cost, and 24.88s average response time.

What makes Gemma 4 31B unique: It stands out most in Domain specific, where it ranks #2, while Coding is its weakest area at #18. Its total benchmark cost is unusually low for its score range.

Model facts

Researched on 2026-08-12

Reported
Parameters
30.7B
Architecture
Dense
Availability
Open source
License
Apache-2.0

Score

8.3

Consistency

9.2

Reliability

N/A

Total Output Tokens

40,684

Total Input Tokens

0

Input Price

$0.130 / 1M

Output Price

$0.380 / 1M

Tests Correct

Wrong Tests: 5

Attempt pass rate: 79.6%

Flaky tests

2

Flaky tests had mixed outcomes across runs (at least one pass and one fail).

Response Time (avg)

24.88s

Response Time (max): 70.97s

Response Time (total): 398.13s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#15 Gemma 4 31B

medium
Cost
$0.002
Time
45.7s
Tokens
2,696 tok

Run history

Tested on Score Reliability Tests Correct Total Cost Compare
2026-08-14 02:55 Re-test 6.2 10.0 $0.101 Compare
2026-07-16 23:24 New test added 6.3 10.0 $0.163 Compare
2026-06-04 14:27 New test added 7.9 8.9 $0.035 Compare
2026-05-22 00:35 Suite changed 8.0 6.7 $0.029 Compare
2026-04-14 00:56 First recorded run 8.3 N/A $0.018 Current run

Charts

Choose the first model, then click a second model to open a side-by-side page.

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Quick Compare

Category Breakdown

Category Score Consistency Tests Correct
Anti-AI Tricks 10.0 10.0
Coding 4.7 1.6
Combined 3.0 10.0
Data parsing and extraction 10.0 10.0
Domain specific 7.7 10.0
General Intelligence 10.0 10.0
Instructions following 10.0 10.0
Puzzle Solving 8.8 7.9
Tool Calling 3.0 10.0

Compared models