- Peringkat
- #104
- Total token output
- 306,044
- Waktu respons (rata-rata)
- 68.44s
- Total Biaya
- $2.454
Grok 4.5 (medium) vs GLM 5.3 (high)
Skor rata-rata hampir imbang di 7.8 vs 7.8. GLM 5.3 (high) memiliki biaya benchmark lebih rendah di $0.610 vs $2.454. GLM 5.3 (high) lebih cepat di 28.38s vs 68.44s, dengan tingkat keberhasilan 79.7% vs 75.4%.
Model yang Dibandingkan
- Peringkat
- #105
- Total token output
- 68,482
- Waktu respons (rata-rata)
- 28.38s
- Total Biaya
- $0.610
Model yang direkomendasikan
GLM 5.3 (high)
It has the best score here (7.8), while costing about 4.0x less than Grok 4.5 (medium).
Perbandingan terperinci
| Metrik | Grok 4.5 Grok 4.5 medium | GLM 5.3 GLM 5.3 high |
|---|---|---|
| Skor | 7.8 | 7.8 |
| Peringkat | #104 | #105 |
| Keandalan | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| Konsistensi | 9.0 | 7.6 |
| Percobaan | 69/69 | 69/69 |
| Tes benar | ||
| Tingkat lulus per percobaan | 79.7% | 75.4% |
| Tes tidak stabil | 3 | 7 |
| Total Run | 69 | 69 |
| Biaya per hasil | 14.430 | 4.351 |
| Total Biaya | $2.454 | $0.610 |
| Harga input | $2.000 / 1M | $1.400 / 1M |
| Harga output | $6.000 / 1M | $4.400 / 1M |
| Total token input | 308,369 | 219,811 |
| Token output | 7,013 | 8,811 |
| Token penalaran | 299,031 | 59,671 |
| Waktu respons (rata-rata) | 68.44s | 28.38s |
| Waktu respons (maks) | 436.38s | 159.91s |
| Waktu respons (total) | 1574.14s | 652.78s |
| Parameter | ~1.7T total (~170B aktif) | 744B total (40B aktif) |
| Ketersediaan | Tertutup | Tertutup |
Showcase generasi model
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#104 SpaceXAI: Grok 4.5
medium- Biaya
- $0.044
- Waktu
- 59.4s
- Token
- 7,512 tok
#105 GLM 5.3
high- Biaya
- $0.085
- Waktu
- 362.5s
- Token
- 19,310 tok
Model teratas berdasarkan skor
Skor vs Total Biaya
Waktu respons (rata-rata)
Skor vs Waktu respons (rata-rata)
Total token output
Skor vs Total token output
Rincian Kategori
Perbandingan Cepat
Ganti Pasangan Perbandingan
Step 3.7 FlashmediumvsGLM 5.3highGrok 4.6mediumvsGLM 5.3highMiMo-V2.6-FlashmediumvsGLM 5.3highQwen3.8 2.4T A95BhighvsGrok 4.5mediumQwen3.7 PlusnonevsGLM 5.3highGemini 3.5 FlashmediumvsGLM 5.3highQwen3.7 PlusnonevsGrok 4.5mediumGrok 4.5lowvsGLM 5.3highDeepSeek V4 Flash 0731mediumvsGLM 5.3highQwen3.7 MaxnonevsGrok 4.5mediumQwen3.7 MaxnonevsGLM 5.3highClaude Fable 5.1highvsGrok 4.5medium