- Peringkat
- #175
- Total token output
- 270,259
- Waktu respons (rata-rata)
- 32.56s
- Total Biaya
- $0.805
Grok 4.20 (medium) vs GLM 5.1 (medium)
Skor rata-rata hampir imbang di 7.0 vs 7.0. GLM 5.1 (medium) memiliki biaya benchmark lebih rendah di $0.726 vs $0.805. Grok 4.20 (medium) lebih cepat di 32.56s vs 58.80s, dengan tingkat keberhasilan 60.6% vs 65.2%.
Model yang Dibandingkan
- Peringkat
- #172
- Total token output
- 215,889
- Waktu respons (rata-rata)
- 58.80s
- Total Biaya
- $0.726
Model yang direkomendasikan
Grok 4.20 (medium)
It has the best score here (7.0), while responding about 1.8x faster than GLM 5.1 (medium).
Perbandingan terperinci
| Metrik | Grok 4.20 Grok 4.20 medium | GLM 5.1 GLM 5.1 medium |
|---|---|---|
| Skor | 7.0 | 7.0 |
| Peringkat | #175 | #172 |
| Keandalan | 10.0 | 8.1 |
| Konsistensi | 8.2 | 8.4 |
| Percobaan | 66/66 | 66/66 |
| Tes benar | ||
| Tingkat lulus per percobaan | 60.6% | 65.2% |
| Tes tidak stabil | 5 | 4 |
| Total Run | 66 | 66 |
| Biaya per hasil | 10.365 | 6.923 |
| Total Biaya | $0.805 | $0.726 |
| Harga input | $1.250 / 1M | $0.965 / 1M |
| Harga output | $2.500 / 1M | $3.032 / 1M |
| Total token input | 102,986 | 82,592 |
| Token output | 5,860 | 16,089 |
| Token penalaran | 264,399 | 199,800 |
| Waktu respons (rata-rata) | 32.56s | 58.80s |
| Waktu respons (maks) | 199.66s | 308.75s |
| Waktu respons (total) | 716.36s | 1234.72s |
| Parameter | ~1T total (~100B aktif) | 744B total (40B aktif) |
| Ketersediaan | Tertutup | Sumber terbuka |
Showcase generasi model
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#175 SpaceXAI: Grok 4.20
medium- Biaya
- $0.041
- Waktu
- 110.3s
- Token
- 16,336 tok
#172 GLM 5.1
medium
Reached the allocated time limit (300 seconds) without receiving showcase output.
- Biaya
- $0.000
- Waktu
- 300.0s
- Token
- 0 tok
Model teratas berdasarkan skor
Skor vs Total Biaya
Waktu respons (rata-rata)
Skor vs Waktu respons (rata-rata)
Total token output
Skor vs Total token output
Rincian Kategori
Perbandingan Cepat
Ganti Pasangan Perbandingan
GPT-5.5nonevsGLM 5.1mediumSpace Bunny AlphahighvsGLM 5.1mediumGPT-5.5nonevsGrok 4.20mediumSpace Bunny AlphahighvsGrok 4.20mediumGPT-6 LunalowvsGLM 5.1mediumGPT-5.6 SolnonevsGLM 5.1mediumGPT-6 LunalowvsGrok 4.20mediumGPT-5.6 SolnonevsGrok 4.20mediumEmber-1highvsGLM 5.1mediumClaude Fable 5.1lowvsGrok 4.20mediumEmber-1highvsGrok 4.20mediumClaude Fable 5.1lowvsGLM 5.1medium